Dheeraj Mor vs High Court of Delhi (2020) Case Summary | Article 233 District Judge Appointment

Описание: 🔗 Full written notes (Quick Summary, Issues, Ratio, IRAC, Mnemonic, FAQs):
Visit: https://thelaweasy.com/dheeraj-mor-vs...

Dheeraj Mor vs High Court of Delhi (2020) is a landmark Supreme Court of India judgment on Article 233 of the Constitution. In this video, we break down the case in simple, classroom-style English so that any law student can understand it in one sitting.

The central question in this case was:

Can serving judicial officers compete with practicing advocates for direct recruitment as District Judges under the Bar quota?

In this explainer, we cover:

Background of the Bar quota and District Judge recruitment

The three categories of candidates who went to Court

Issues before the Supreme Court on Article 233

Arguments of the petitioners and the High Courts/States

Detailed analysis by the Bench (Arun Mishra J. and Ravindra Bhat J.)

Final judgment and overruling of the earlier view in Vijay Kumar Mishra

Clear rule: Bar quota = only for practicing advocates, not for serving judicial officers

Easy exam pointers, mnemonic “BAR – NOT – BENCH”, and IRAC outline

🔗 Full written notes (Quick Summary, Issues, Ratio, IRAC, Mnemonic, FAQs):
Visit: https://thelaweasy.com/dheeraj-mor-vs...

This video is especially useful for:

Law students preparing for university exams

CLAT PG and PSU aspirants

Judiciary aspirants studying Constitutional Law and Service Law

Anyone confused about Article 233, Bar quota and District Judge appointments

If this video helps you:

👍 Like the video
💬 Comment your doubts or next case request
📌 Share with your friends
✅ Subscribe to the channel for more easy case explainers

#DheerajMor #Article233 #DistrictJudge #BarQuota #SupremeCourtOfIndia #TheLawEasy