Textile Circularity 2.0: Turning Waste into Profit, Purpose, and Progress worth $11 billion
Автор: CABDesign
Загружено: 2026-02-10
Просмотров: 0
Описание:
How Global North textile tech can be legally adapted into a Southern playbook for circular building materials, without infringing IP, and while shifting value to receiving markets
Blog : https://ideaswiz.com/textile-waste-reuse-b...
Blog : https://ideaswiz.com/textile-circularity-2...
Substack: https://cabusinessdesignconsultancy.substa...
substack: https://cabusinessdesignconsultancy.substa...
Millions of garments move from the Global North to the Global South every week. A large share becomes local waste. Beaches clog with fabric, wetlands trap synthetics, and municipalities carry disposal costs they did not create. The scale is measurable. Global discarded clothing reached about 120 million tonnes in 2024, while global fibre production hit 124 million tonnes in 2023. Less than 1 percent returns as inputs for new textiles. EU countries discard about 5 million tonnes a year, and only around 1 percent becomes new clothing. These numbers define the opportunity and the responsibility.
This feature asks a practical question. Can receiving regions build local, scalable industries that turn this waste into useful building materials, using safe chemistry, simple equipment, and an IP-safe path. The short answer is yes, if we treat technology transfer as design, not copying, and if we design for local value capture from the start. The attached playbook shows what this looks like in practice, including recipes, testing, AI data systems, and a Ghana pilot roadmap.
Quality: Prioritize consistent, high-volume streams from councils and national charities. Avoid heavily contaminated streams initially.
Fibre Type: Cotton and denim are ideal for non-woven products (panels, boards). Polyester is key for fibre-to-fibre recycling partnerships.
Cost: Must be available at a fee ≤ £60/tonne to protect margin, well below the landfill tax.
2. Product Selection:
Margin Potential: Target gross margins of 35-50%. Favour products with value-added design and performance stories (e.g., acoustic panels over industrial wipes).
Market Demand: Prioritize products with existing, large markets (e.g., UK office fit-out, e-commerce packaging).
Regulatory Alignment: Products that help customers meet sustainability targets and future DPP requirements are preferred.
Technical Feasibility: Start with products that can be made with the core “shred-blend-press” technology stack.
3. Offtake Partner Selection:
Creditworthiness: Stable, established businesses.
Volume Commitment: Preference for partners willing to sign rolling call-off orders or annual contracts.
Value Alignment: Partners who value and will market the recycled content and DPP story, not just price.
Channel Access: Distributors with existing routes to market (e.g., acoustic installers) are ideal.
4. Site Location Selection:
Proximity to Feedstock: Minimize transport costs by being near urban centres or charity sorting hubs.
Proximity to Market: For bulky products like panels, being near construction and manufacturing hubs reduces logistics expense.
Utilities & Space: Ensure adequate power (for presses) and space for feedstock storage and expansion.
Повторяем попытку...
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео
-
Информация по загрузке: