Ad Hoc Committee EXPOSED: Cartels or Cadres? Inside the Political Games at the Ad Hoc Committee

Описание: TIMESTAMP:
00:00 INTRODUCTION
00:45 AD HOC COMMITTEE IS A POLITICAL GROUND FOR POLITICIANS
05:06 THE CHAIR FAILED GENERAL KHUMALO
05:59 WHY MPS FAILED TO ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT SHANICK ?
07:16 ARREST OF DUMISANI KHUMALO
07:57 WAS THE CELLPHONE OF MATLALA TEMPERED WITH?
14:34 ANDREA COINCIDENCE
16:15 ANDREA LIED ABOUT THE CHARGES AGAINST KHUMALO
17:39 WHEN DID THEY KNOW ABOUT MATLALA
18:24 MATLALA LIED ABOUT NOT SELLING DRUGS WHEN DUMISANI SAID HE IS
19:46 NEPOTISM IN THE SAPS
20:18 "THERE IS STILL INTERFERENCE"
21:10 LIES OF SHADRACK SIBIYA EXPOSED FOR DUMISANI KHUMALO
23:55 CONCLUSION

In this video, we unpack the second half of the Ad Hoc Committee proceedings, where it became increasingly clear that politics—not truth—was driving the discussion.

Instead of focusing on uncovering facts around the alleged cartels raised by Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, Members of Parliament appeared more concerned with defending political allies and advancing party agendas.

🔴 Key issues discussed in this video:
1️⃣ The Political Nature of Parliament Exposed

Parliament is inherently political—but during this session, that reality became unavoidable. MPs openly pushed party narratives, often at the expense of meaningful accountability.

2️⃣ Hon. Ashley Sauls & the Cartel Denial
Honourable Ashley Sauls repeatedly attempted to refute the very existence of cartels, a position that becomes politically significant given:
Kenny Kunene’s alleged presence at Katiso Molefe’s house
The implications for the Patriotic Alliance
By dismissing the cartel narrative entirely, implicated political figures are indirectly shielded from scrutiny.

3️⃣ Selective Silence: Mthethwa & Political Connections
Questions around Mthethwa, allegedly close to the Deputy President of the Patriotic Alliance, were notably deflected—highlighting selective accountability.

4️⃣ Khuselo Diko-Sangweni & ANC Women’s League Tensions
Honourable Khuselo Diko-Sangweni took positions that have sparked criticism even within ANC structures. Her stance reveals deeper internal political contradictions, which will be unpacked further in a dedicated video.

5️⃣ Weaponising Opposition Figures
Honourable James attempted to draw Xolani Khumalo, an ActionSA mayoral candidate, into the controversy—further demonstrating how the committee drifted into political point-scoring.

6️⃣ The Unasked Questions: Stuart James Sharnick
One of the most troubling moments was Parliament’s failure to interrogate Stuart James Sharnick, who:
Appeared before Parliament
Allegedly misrepresented his legal role linked to Shadrack Sibiya
Was only exposed through testimony by Gen. Dumisani Khumalo
Why was this never questioned by MPs?

7️⃣ Shadrack Sibiya’s Contradictions
The video also examines alleged inconsistencies in Sibiya’s claims regarding:
The PKTT having “run its course”
Its extension
The false claim that it was to be absorbed into the Mid-Unit structure
These contradictions were largely ignored by Parliament.

8️⃣ The Cell Phone Controversy: Who Is Lying?
A major dispute involves the cell phones of Vusumuzi ‘CAT’ Matlala:
PKTT members downloaded data during the December 6 raid
Matlala and Andrea Johnson (IDAC) allege tampering
Gen. Dumisani Khumalo strongly denied any tampering, explaining:
Phones were still on due to ongoing data extraction
IDAC demanded the devices urgently
Pressure flowed from IDAC → National Commissioner → Investigators
This raises serious questions about interference, rushed evidence handling, and institutional pressure.

📌 Core Question This Video Asks:
Did Parliament fail South Africans by prioritising political protection over truth and justice?

💬 Join the discussion:
Is the Ad Hoc Committee capable of uncovering the truth?
Or will it remain a political battlefield?
👇 Comment below.
🔔 Like, Share & Subscribe

For independent political and legal analysis on South Africa’s justice system, Parliament, and accountability.

⚖️ LEGAL DISCLAIMER
This video analyses parliamentary proceedings and sworn testimony. It does not allege guilt or make findings of fact.