Running a Parallel Process to Save Results in Python

Описание: Learn how to run a parallel process in Python that saves results from a main function efficiently, allowing continuous operation without waiting on slow I/O tasks.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66225291/ asked by the user 'RVA92' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9576116/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66254836/ provided by the user 'Aaron' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3220135/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Run a parallel process saving results from a main process in Python

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Running a Parallel Process to Save Results in Python

In Python applications, especially those that handle heavy computations or I/O-bound operations, it's essential to efficiently manage tasks without blocking the main execution thread. A common scenario is having a function that processes a list of tasks and needs to save the results while continuing to process other tasks. In this guide, we'll explore how to achieve this in Python by running a parallel process to save results from a main process, tapping into the power of Python's multiprocessing, threading, and asyncio modules.

The Problem

Imagine you have a function that generates results from a list of tasks. While generating results is quick, saving these results can be a slow operation. Here’s a simplified version of the approach you might be considering:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this approach, the main loop would get blocked, waiting for the save_nice_results_to_db function to finish saving before moving on to the next task. This can lead to inefficient resource utilization and longer execution times, especially when dealing with large numbers of tasks. So, how can we allow the main process to keep working while the results are being saved? Here are potential solutions you might consider.

Solution Approaches

1. Using Processes with multiprocessing

The multiprocessing module allows you to create separate processes that can run concurrently. This is particularly useful if you want to utilize multiple CPU cores. Here's a basic implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Considerations:

Overhead: Be aware that multiprocessing incurs overhead due to the need to serialize data (using pickle) for communication between processes. If result is large, this overhead can negate the benefits of parallelism, so always conduct tests to measure performance.

Data Sharing: For Python versions 3.8 and above, explore the shared_memory module, which allows for more efficient sharing of large data between processes.

2. Using Threads with threading

If your task involves I/O-bound operations (such as network access or file I/O), then using threads could be more efficient since they share the same memory space. However, keep in mind the GIL (Global Interpreter Lock) in Python. Here’s how you might set it up:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Considerations:

With threads, there's no overhead for data transfer since they share memory. However, the GIL means pure CPU-bound tasks may not run concurrently as efficiently as you would like.

Functions involved in I/O operations can release the GIL, allowing other threads to run while waiting for I/O operations to complete.

3. Leveraging asyncio

asyncio is perfect for managing concurrent I/O tasks using coroutines. It allows you to queue multiple operations and handle asynchronous events. To incorporate asyncio, the function that processes tasks and saves results needs to be asynchronous:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Considerations:

asyncio can handle many concurrent I/O-bound tasks more efficiently than threads and processes, but it requires you to design your functions as coroutines, which is a different programming paradigm than standard functions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, several methods can help you achieve parallel processing in Python while preserving the efficiency of your main loop. Whether using multiprocessing, threading, or asyncio, the right choice will depend on the specific characteristics of your tasks and results. Critical factors to take into account include how large your results are, whether your tasks are CPU-bound or I/O-bound, and the overhead eac