Gonzalez v. Google, Inc. (2018) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary

Описание: The case involves a lawsuit filed by plaintiffs against Google under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), claiming that Google provided material support to ISIS by allowing its platform, YouTube, to be used for the dissemination of ISIS-related content. The plaintiffs alleged that Google acted as an information content provider by placing targeted ads with ISIS-related content and recommending content to users based on what is known about them. The court found that Claims one through four, as well as the fifth claim alleging that Google concealed material support and resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization, are barred by section 230(c)(1)'s immunity. The plaintiffs' claims that Google violated various federal criminal statutes by knowingly and willfully engaging in transactions with and providing funds, goods, or services to Specially Designated Global Terrorists, including ISIS and its members, are also barred by section 230(c)(1) since they seek to treat Google as the publisher or speaker of third-party content. However, the court allowed the plaintiffs to amend their revenue sharing claims.

Gonzalez v. Google, Inc. (2018)
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
335 F. Supp. 3d 1156

Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/gonza...

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_c...