ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

James Baird Co. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Автор: Quimbee

Загружено: 2020-11-09

Просмотров: 1422

Описание: Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

James Baird Co. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc. | 64 F.2d 344 (1933)

In the cutthroat world of construction, a few extra dollars in a bid can mean the difference between success and failure, but bidding too low can kill any chance of profits. That’s why the contractor in the 1933 case of James Baird Company versus Gimbel Brothers was so keen on keeping a quoted price from a linoleum provider.

The Pennsylvania Department of Highways sought bids for the construction of a public building. Gimbel Brothers, a merchant, estimated the amount of linoleum the job would require and sent letters to a number of contractors. Gimmel Brothers offered to supply linoleum for the construction job at a price based on that estimate.

The James Baird Company, a contractor, received Gimbel’s offer and immediately incorporated Gimbel’s linoleum price into its bid. That same day, Gimbel discovered that its estimate was actually half what it should have been. It telegraphed all the contractors it had contacted, withdrawing its original offer and replacing it with another offer at twice the price. This telegram arrived at Baird right after it submitted its bid for the construction project. The highway department accepted Baird’s bid.

Baird insisted that it had formed a contract with Gimbel to supply linoleum at the originally stated price. Gimbel said there was no contract. Baird sued. The District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York found that Gimbel had withdrawn its offer before Baird accepted it, and that there was thus no contract. Baird appealed.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/james-b...

The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/james-b...

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...
Facebook ►   / quimbeedotcom  
Twitter ►   / quimbeedotcom  
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
James Baird Co. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

Удар по Темрюку, Трамп в Давосе, Адам идет на поправку. Галлямов, Касьянов, Филиппенко

Удар по Темрюку, Трамп в Давосе, Адам идет на поправку. Галлямов, Касьянов, Филиппенко

"Trzeba dbać o robotę” — rynek zaczyna dyktować warunki

SKANDAL w KRS! Prokuratorzy Żurka przeglądają akta mimo ZAKAZU | Miłosz Kłeczek Zaprasza

SKANDAL w KRS! Prokuratorzy Żurka przeglądają akta mimo ZAKAZU | Miłosz Kłeczek Zaprasza

Contract Law: Promissory Estoppel (Drennan v. Star Paving Co.) [LEAP Preview]

Contract Law: Promissory Estoppel (Drennan v. Star Paving Co.) [LEAP Preview]

Contract Law 34 II Drennan v Star Paving (mistaken bid)

Contract Law 34 II Drennan v Star Paving (mistaken bid)

NAWROCKI I TRUMP: Ten sojusz przeraża Brukselę i polski rząd! | Gość Dzisiaj

NAWROCKI I TRUMP: Ten sojusz przeraża Brukselę i polski rząd! | Gość Dzisiaj

Джимми Киммел вернулся!

Джимми Киммел вернулся!

Pułapka Trumpa. Służby i tajemncie prezydenta.

Pułapka Trumpa. Służby i tajemncie prezydenta. "Tchórzostwo rządu" | BEZ TRYBU

Dzisiaj Informacje Telewizja Republika 21.01.2026 | TV Republika

Dzisiaj Informacje Telewizja Republika 21.01.2026 | TV Republika

Contract Law 2 Intro Ricketts v Scothorn (foregoing employment)

Contract Law 2 Intro Ricketts v Scothorn (foregoing employment)

Przestań to robić przed snem. Kradnie zdrowie i kilka lat życia 🫨

Przestań to robić przed snem. Kradnie zdrowie i kilka lat życia 🫨

Contract Law 19 I Allegheny College v Nat  Chautauqua County Bank

Contract Law 19 I Allegheny College v Nat Chautauqua County Bank

Bandycki napad żurkowców Tuska na KRS | A. Klarenbach | Republika Wieczór

Bandycki napad żurkowców Tuska na KRS | A. Klarenbach | Republika Wieczór

PAVLIDIS SIĘ MYLI, STARA DAMA NADAL W GRZE! JUVENTUS - BENFICA, SKRÓT MECZU

PAVLIDIS SIĘ MYLI, STARA DAMA NADAL W GRZE! JUVENTUS - BENFICA, SKRÓT MECZU

Contract Law 16 I Wood v Lucy, Lady Duff Gordon

Contract Law 16 I Wood v Lucy, Lady Duff Gordon

Seeing What Snapshots Cannot: The Power of Temporal Analysis

Seeing What Snapshots Cannot: The Power of Temporal Analysis

🔴 NOCNA ZMIANA | KAMILA BIEDRZYCKA & DR MIROSŁAW OCZKOŚ

🔴 NOCNA ZMIANA | KAMILA BIEDRZYCKA & DR MIROSŁAW OCZKOŚ

Carnival Cruise Line, Inc. v. Shute Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Carnival Cruise Line, Inc. v. Shute Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

SAMOBÓJ I 106. GOL LEWANDOWSKIEGO W LIDZE MISTRZÓW! | SLAVIA - FC BARCELONA, SKRÓT MECZU

SAMOBÓJ I 106. GOL LEWANDOWSKIEGO W LIDZE MISTRZÓW! | SLAVIA - FC BARCELONA, SKRÓT MECZU

SZOBOSZLAI WYKIWAŁ WSZYSTKICH! PEWNA WYGRANA

SZOBOSZLAI WYKIWAŁ WSZYSTKICH! PEWNA WYGRANA "THE REDS"! MARSYLIA - LIVERPOOL, SKRÓT MECZU

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]