ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal (AIR 1967 SC 1857)

Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal

Article 12 Indian Constitution

definition of State

other authorities

statutory corporation

Fundamental Rights India

writ jurisdiction

Supreme Court 1967

public sector undertaking

constitutional law accountability

Автор: Legal Studies

Загружено: 2025-12-13

Просмотров: 90

Описание: This video examines the landmark Supreme Court of India case, Rajasthan State Electricity Board (RSEB) v. Mohan Lal (AIR 1967 SC 1857), which delivered a crucial interpretation of the term "The State" as defined under Article 12 of the Indian Constitution. This interpretation is fundamental to determining which bodies can be held accountable for violating Fundamental Rights.

💡 The Legal Question
The central issue before the Court was whether the Rajasthan State Electricity Board, a statutory corporation created by a State Act, qualified as "The State" or an "authority" under Article 12. If it did, it would be subject to the limitations imposed by the Constitution, including the Fundamental Rights (Part III) and the writ jurisdiction of the Courts (Article 226).

🏛️ The Landmark Ruling
The Supreme Court ruled that the RSEB did fall within the definition of "The State" under Article 12.

The Court held that the expression "other authorities" in Article 12 must be interpreted broadly. It established that:

It is not necessary that a body should have sovereign functions or the power to make laws to be considered an "authority."

Any body—whether statutory, non-statutory, or corporate—that is created by the Constitution or statute and has the power to issue directions or orders that compel obedience can be classified as an "authority" under Article 12.

Significance in Constitutional Law
This case is monumentally important as it was the first major judicial expansion of the definition of "The State" beyond the legislative and executive branches.

It brought various statutory corporations and public sector undertakings under the scope of Fundamental Rights accountability.

It laid the groundwork for the future evolution of the "instrumentality or agency of the government" test, later refined in cases like Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, ensuring that large governmental undertakings cannot evade constitutional limitations simply by being structured as a corporate body.

Why watch? Understand the essential definition of "The State" in Indian Constitutional Law and how the Supreme Court ensured that public sector bodies are held accountable to Fundamental Rights.

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal (AIR 1967 SC 1857)

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]