One single verse against ALL of history! 😳

Описание: Sam Shamoun tackles one of the most explosive topics in Islamic-Christian dialogue: the death and crucifixion of Jesus in the Qur’an, the Bible, and historical sources. Starting from the Qur’anic verse “they did not kill him nor crucify him… but it was made to appear so” (4:157), the debate dives into the core questions: Who is Jesus? Did he really die? Does the Qur’an contradict historical evidence? And why do the first centuries of Christianity matter so much for understanding this controversial verse? 🔥

Throughout the debate, Shamoun cites Arabic lexicons, tafsir (exegesis), historical analysis, and Christian apologetics, dismantling several popular narratives (e.g. Judas substitution, disciple substitution, tawaffa, ascension, Docetism, etc.). The exchange becomes intense, technical, and confrontational, yet extremely informative for anyone interested in the intersection of Islam, the Bible, history, and Christology. ⚔️📚

This compilation aims to offer a clear and structured analysis for viewers who are tired of shallow discussions. Here, arguments are tested on coherence, historical validity, and internal logic, without filters. 🧠

Key Topics Discussed:

– Did Jesus die according to the Qur’an?
– Tawaffa = “cause to die”? Or something else?
– First-century historical sources
– Multiple witnesses to crucifixion
– Qur’an vs. Bible vs. historical record
– Docetism & early Christian theology
– Criteria of historical authenticity
– Islam vs. Christian apologetics

For viewers interested in:

Religion, theology, apologetics, Islamic studies, historical Jesus research, comparative religion debates, or simply learning something new. 🎓

SEO Keywords (Long-Tail):

Islam Christianity debate, crucifixion of Jesus Qur’an, death of Jesus in Islam, Sam Shamoun debate, Christian apologetics Islam, Qur’an crucifixion exegesis, tawaffa Qur’an, Jesus in Islam, interfaith dialogue, historical Jesus sources, Docetism Islam, Islamic claims on crucifixion.

Watch the debate and decide for yourself: history, theology, or ideology? 👀