Prince Harry was a very compelling witness according to experts.

Описание: SKY NEWS PRESS PREVIEW.
And this matters.

Because this wasn’t fluff commentary this was seasoned press analysts reacting in real time to Prince Harry’s performance in court.

Their words, not mine:

“Harry was a very compelling witness.”

Not defensive.
Not confused.
Not emotional in a way that undermined him.

Compelling.

They went on:

“He’s intelligent, he’s articulate, he’s genuine. He comes across genuinely
and he knows the issues inside out.”

That’s not how the press usually talks about Harry.

And here’s the key part the strategic read.

Sky’s panel suggested that Associated Newspapers may have cut their own cross-examination short just two hours, instead of running him all day because it wasn’t going their way.

One analyst said:

“I think Harry held up well enough that they thought, this is damaging to us.”

And then this:

“This may have been a tactical decision by Associated’s lawyers that this isn’t going well, and we should pull him out early so he doesn’t do any more damage.”

That is huge.

Because cross-examination is where reputations are supposed to crack.
That’s where witnesses are exposed.
That’s where the story unravels.

And it didn’t.

Harry didn’t crumble.
He didn’t contradict himself.
He didn’t look out of his depth.

He looked prepared.
Informed.
Grounded.

This is a man who has lived with media intrusion since he was a child who buried his mother under the glare of flashbulbs and who finally decided to confront the system head-on.

And for once, the press couldn’t spin him as foolish, emotional, or unstable.

So when people ask why this case matters,
or why Harry keeps going…

This is why.

Because when he’s allowed to speak in a courtroom, under oath the narrative changes.

That’s my People’s Prince Harry.

And that’s why this case has the media nervous.

#PrinceHarryVsDailyMail