"Neha Lal vs Abhishek Kumar: 65-Day Marriage to 13-Year Legal War"

Описание: A marriage that lasted just 65 days turned into a 13-year-long legal war involving 40+ cases across multiple courts.

In Neha Lal vs Abhishek Kumar, the Supreme Court of India was confronted with one of the most extreme examples of matrimonial litigation, where two well-educated, professionally qualified parties transformed the judicial system into a battlefield of revenge, rather than a forum for justice.

This case raises critical questions:

Can a marriage be dissolved without mutual consent?

What happens when litigation becomes endless and punitive?

Can divorce end all disputes, or do criminal liabilities like perjury survive?

How is Article 142 used to do “complete justice”?

Why did the Supreme Court warn against AI-generated and fabricated evidence in matrimonial disputes?

🔍 Key issues covered in this video:

65 days of cohabitation vs 13 years of litigation

Over 40 cases including divorce, domestic violence, maintenance, IPC offences

Court’s observation on treating courts as a “battlefield”

Dissolution of marriage despite husband’s objection

Refusal to quash perjury proceedings

Supreme Court’s historic warning on misuse of law and AI-fabricated evidence

⚖️ This judgment is a landmark warning for litigants, lawyers, and courts—that law is meant for justice, not vengeance.

📚 Who should watch this video?

Judiciary aspirants

Law students & legal professionals

Family law practitioners

Anyone interested in Supreme Court judgments & legal reforms

🔔 Disclaimer

This video is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice.
#NehaLalVsAbhishekKumar #65DayMarriage #13YearLegalBattle #SupremeCourtCase #DivorceDrama #MatrimonialDispute #Article142 #SCJudgment2026 #DeadMarriage #IndianDivorce #LegalWar #WarringCouples #498AMisuse #FamilyCourt #SCFamilyLaw #DivorceIndia #CourtroomBattle #MutualConsent #LegalDrama #ShadiKaKalesh