ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Автор: Quimbee

Загружено: 2020-09-17

Просмотров: 4749

Описание: Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Association | 802 F.3d 1049 (2015)

In the 1984 case National Collegiate Athletic Association, or NCAA, versus Board of Regents, the United States Supreme Court held that the NCAA must comply with the provisions of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which prohibits unreasonable restraints on trade. More than thirty years later, in the 2015 case O’Bannon versus NCAA, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered whether the NCAA’s amateurism rules limiting student-athlete compensation to scholarships violated antitrust laws.

In 2008, former UCLA all-American basketball player Ed O’Bannon visited a close friends’ house. While visiting, the friend’s son told O’Bannon that he was depicted in a college-basketball video game. The friend’s son then turned on the video game and showed O’Bannon his virtual avatar, which included his name, jersey number, and college. O’Bannon never consented to the use of his likeness in the video game and had never been compensated for it.

Subsequently, O’Bannon sued the NCAA and the Collegiate Licensing Company, which licenses NCAA trademarks, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Specifically, O’Bannon argued that the NCAA’s amateurism rules, which prohibit athletes from being paid for their names, images, or likenesses, were an illegal restraint of trade under the Sherman Act. Following a bench trial, the court entered judgment for O’Bannon, holding that the NCAA’s rules prohibiting student-athletes from being paid violated the Sherman Act. The court also enjoined the NCAA from prohibiting schools from paying athletes up to $5,000 per year in deferred compensation. The NCAA appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/o-banno...

The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/o-banno...

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...
Facebook ►   / quimbeedotcom  
Twitter ►   / quimbeedotcom  
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

Ed O'Bannon: hero, flameout ... Face of a Movement

Ed O'Bannon: hero, flameout ... Face of a Movement

The Synopsis: NCAA v. Alston, 2021

The Synopsis: NCAA v. Alston, 2021

Career Mode since SU4 Improvements - PDeltaBravo

Career Mode since SU4 Improvements - PDeltaBravo

The Crown Court

The Crown Court

Ed O'Bannon Explains Why College Athletes Need to be Paid | The Players' Tribune

Ed O'Bannon Explains Why College Athletes Need to be Paid | The Players' Tribune

How to Argue Like a Lawyer (and WIN) with 4-Step Formula

How to Argue Like a Lawyer (and WIN) with 4-Step Formula

Удаляем свои фото, выходим из чатов, скрываем фамилию? Как избежать штрафов

Удаляем свои фото, выходим из чатов, скрываем фамилию? Как избежать штрафов

60 Minutes Archive: Stealing America's Secrets

60 Minutes Archive: Stealing America's Secrets

National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

How the Nazis created an economic miracle

How the Nazis created an economic miracle

O'Bannon v. NCAA: Intellectual Property, Antitrust, & College Sports [POLICYbrief]

O'Bannon v. NCAA: Intellectual Property, Antitrust, & College Sports [POLICYbrief]

How the NIL market has shaken up college, high school sports | Nightline

How the NIL market has shaken up college, high school sports | Nightline

Instead of Working: Become UNEMPLOYABLE to Prepare for the FUTURE

Instead of Working: Become UNEMPLOYABLE to Prepare for the FUTURE

Как работала машина

Как работала машина "Энигма"?

House v. NCAA

House v. NCAA

What’s the point of international law? | Start Here

What’s the point of international law? | Start Here

The NCAA vs Ed O'Bannon lawsuit explained in under two minutes (Daily Win)

The NCAA vs Ed O'Bannon lawsuit explained in under two minutes (Daily Win)

ABA Supreme Court NCAA v Alston Discussion with Prof. William Berry

ABA Supreme Court NCAA v Alston Discussion with Prof. William Berry

College Athletes Are Cashing In on the NCAA’s New Rules | WSJ

College Athletes Are Cashing In on the NCAA’s New Rules | WSJ

House v. NCAA Case Can UPEND College Football As You Know It... | Cover 3

House v. NCAA Case Can UPEND College Football As You Know It... | Cover 3

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]