Czerny/Bach #8: Finally proven WRONG??

Описание: Episode 8 comparing Czerny's Metronome Marks for Bach's inventions to performances of the last 80 years. The F major is one of the fastest of all and yet 2 players (almost) reach the Single Beat level. Finally proven wrong?

0:00 Introduction
0:53 Notation 3/4
2:35 Allegro molto here?
2:59 2 pianist are almost in SB
3:48 Overview 9 performances
5:24 Overview temp
6:57 Single Beat finally proven?
7:27 always listen how a performance ends!
8:27 let's not forget Czerny describes the inventions as "easy"
9:35 Whole Beat and Single Beat comparison
12:37 the end of the SB performances

Entire playlist:    • Carl Czerny: Pedantic Bach Destroyer or no...  
--
🙋We need YOU to continue on (full) speed! THANK YOU for even considering becoming a patreon!▶  / authenticsound  
--
Our solution to the metronome problem is called the WBMP (Whole Beat Metronome Principle). Many other 19th century metronome marks is to read them in -what we believe - was the old way: in Whole Beat. In this reading, like the pendulum is still used today by physicians, the metronome ticks indicate the subdivision of the note value in the metronome mark. So you end up counting like one AND two AND three AND... That results in a different tempo yes, but a tempo that exactly matches the metronome mark given by the composer. In our current reading of these metronome marks, we are not able to do that for the simple reason most are way too fast. A logical consequence from actually doubling (yes) the intended tempo. New to the WBMP? Start here:    • How Fast did Beethoven and Chopin really P...  

See our Beethoven's sonatas playlist here: http://bit.ly/BeethovenUnchained
--
📩One weekly mail in your mailbox? 👉http://bit.ly/as-mailinglist
--
📱 Website: ▶http://www.authenticsound.org