Sovereign Citizen Demands 1400$ for Each Appearance… And The Judge SHUTS DOWN

Описание: #instantkarma #courtroomreality #sovereigncitizen #judgewins

THE JUDGE SHUTS DOWN A LEGAL FANTASY IN REAL TIME

A sovereign citizen refuses to play by courtroom rules, believing silence and buzzwords equal power.
But every decision quietly strips away protection — until the judge locks the case onto a path that can’t be undone.

Timestamps
⚖️ 00:00 – Teaser Explosion
⚖️ 00:35 – Attorney Withdraws Over “Theory of Law”
⚖️ 01:06 – Self-Representation Decision Point
⚖️ 05:35 – Silence Becomes a Plea
⚖️ 06:32 – Personal Bond Granted
⚖️ 08:23 – Jurisdiction Challenge Fails

Litigants List
• Judge: Judge Chungan
• Defendant: Randall Timothy Crane — sovereign citizen defendant
• Plaintiff/Victim: City of Taylor
• Others: James Kaji (former counsel), Officer Schillenberg (complainant)

Arraignment → Formal court stage where charges and rights are read, and a plea is entered.
Personal Bond → Release without money, based only on a promise to return to court.
Pre-Trial Conference → Meeting where the defense and prosecutor discuss the case before trial.
Stands Mute → Defendant refuses to plead; the court enters a plea automatically.
Jurisdiction → The court’s legal authority over the person and the case.

If you like watching courtroom reality collide with internet legal myths, hit like, drop your take in the comments, subscribe, and ring the bell so you don’t miss the next one.

#CourtroomDrama #LegalReality #JudgeAuthority #SovCitFails #RealCourt #LawAndConsequences #courtcam #justicesystem #CourtroomLessons #LegalBreakdown #TrueCourt sovereign citizen court case, judge shuts down sovcit, jurisdiction argument fails, standing mute court, personal bond explained, real courtroom drama

Original Channel: ‪@WEGOTACASE‬

Original Video:    • Sovereign Citizen DEMANDS The Court To PAY...  



DISCLAIMER
The content on Lawyered is for educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney–client relationship. All commentary reflects our interpretation of publicly available court records and laws at the time of production. Laws and procedures vary by jurisdiction, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to their situation.

FAIR USE NOTICE
This video uses copyrighted material under Fair Use (Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act) for commentary, criticism, education, and analysis. All clips are transformed for informational purposes, condensed for clarity, and intended to enhance public understanding. All rights belong to their respective owners.
Lawyered highlights real courtroom proceedings to educate viewers about the judicial process and legal consequences. All individuals featured are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.