Baron David Ward | Explains the Decree & Affidavit
Автор: Div3rgent Motivation
Загружено: 2022-10-17
Просмотров: 2820
Описание:
https://bdwfacts.com/public-notices-l...
Disclaimer : the video dosen't correspond to the audio so don't let yr OCD quick in 😎😁
What is "LAW" ?
"LAW" is merely a 'presumption', nothing more.
"Where a presumption is nothing of material substance and any presumption can be dismissed by a formal challenge". In other words The (so called) "LAW" is just a bunch of words written down on on paper. It isn't magical, it doesn't appear out of thin air, it's not just "because someone said so". There has got to be a 'FOUNDATION IN FACT' of how something applies to you.
There is a claim of a "government" BY "the consent of the governed", (that is the underlying claim), so with that word 'consent' there is either a contractual agreement, or there is the lack there of.
When you start looking at this logically you will think "how does this even apply to me?", and once you become fully aware of the facts you will soon realise that it DOESN'T.
"The State" is a Legal Embodiment BY an Act of Registration, it is of no Material Substance.. So then how is this so called State/Company able to create "LAWS" ?, and these "laws"....how do they apply to you and I?
Well, the individual 'in the Office of' is operating under the presumption that just because you are physically in the UK these laws apply; IF this was to be the case then the individual is 'claiming' to have first-hand, personal knowledge that the circa 67.5 million people in the UK have formally signed the Legally required 'Consent of the Governed',
So that is a CLAIM.
"He who makes a claim bears the burden of proof and carries the OBLIGATION to provide the material evidence to support that claim"
ALWAYS keep the burden of proof on the claimant, NEVER make claims of your own.
Let the 'claimant' make the claims, i.e.,
CLAIM:
-"It is not me making you do this it comes from the government under section something of the so and so act " that is one helluva claim (Helluva= Idiosyncratic language for "hell of a", in case anybody was about to correct me 😉).
The CLAIM needs to be supported by FACTS, Physical, Presentable, Material Evidence otherwise that claim becomes FRAUDULENT in nature, and (a chargeable criminal offence).
Basically that CLAIM implies there is a Legal and Legitimate Government that has the power to make "laws". It implies that 67.5 million people have formally signed in wet in the Legally required 'Consent of the Governed', and that the claimant has first-hand knowledge of this; It implies that 67.5 million people have formally and legally transferred their Power of Attorney (every 4 years) in the UK, and that the claimant has first-hand knowledge of this; It also implies that "the state" is of material substance, and that it has the ability to speak and act....
Unfortunately for the claimant we can PROVE OTHERWISE. That Physical Presentable Material Tangible Proof is contained within the 65 pages of the Baron David Ward's Affidavit.
This Affidavit was served on all 657 MPs in the OFFICE OF WESTMINSTER in 2015 and after 28 days the Unrebutted Affidavit created a binding, lasting tacit agreement to the content which was then made a public document when the BDW added the decree at the front....
(in layman's terms) that there is: NO LEGAL OR LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT on this PLANET,
Therefore, the ACTS AND STATUTES OF HM PARLIAMENTS AND GOVERNMENTS PLC CAN ONLY BE GIVEN THE FORCE OF LAW BY THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED, the word BY creates a legal dependency which MUST be fulfilled, NEVER in 800 years has that dependency been fulfilled. There are NO governed people and there are NO governments (one cannot exist without the other), and ANYBODY on the planet can use this Affidavit as their own foundation in FACT.
Download the Affidavit (from the pinned posts), the Affidavit Starter Kit and the FAQS, read it over and over until it sinks in. Serve the Affidavit kept just as it is (via email, equivalent to recorded post) to all the MPs in office and any individual claiming to have authority from the "government" through an Act/Statute (Legislation) of HM Parliaments and Governments PLC Company/State.
That individual now carries the formal and noted obligation to provide a full rebuttal on a point by point basis to the Affidavit. No rebuttal means they have NO AUTHORITY and IF they continue THEN their actions are fraudulent in nature which THEREFORE, become Chargeable Criminal Offences.
NO CONTRACT = NO OBLIGATION.
Have a great day 🙏
Повторяем попытку...
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео
-
Информация по загрузке: