Discuss the main provisions of The Citizenship Act, 1955. What are the contemporary debates on..

Описание: Citizenship is the right to have rights” was famously claimed by Hannah Arendt. The case of the Slovenian erased sheds new light on this assumption that was supposedly put to rest after World War II. We lack a comprehensive paradigm for grasping what citizenship means today in, and for, our societies. My thesis is that there are currently three ways to understand the notion. These different views tend to merge and overlap in today’s debate, furthering misunderstandings. I will account for the different conceptions of citizenship by looking at the opposite of citizenry. The political model holds the subject (sujet) in opposition to the citizen (citoyen), entailing problems related to the democratic quality of institutions. Law and jurisprudence look at citizenship by trying to limit the numerous hard cases arising in a world of migration where the opposite of the citizen is the alien and the stateless. While in social science citizenship is the opposite of exclusion and represents social membership, my aim is therefore to distinguish and clear out these three different semantic areas.
This essay is presented in four sections: First, I briefly recall the case of the erased. The second section focuses on discourse analysis so as to enucleate the three different meanings of citizenship that we find in the current debate according to the prevailing disciplinary fields: political, legal and social sciences. Thirdly, attention will be directed to the composition of the different semantic areas that are connected to the term citizenship. I suggest that we are now dealing with a threefold notion. Finally, I will point to an array of questions that citizenship raises in today’s complex society and try to show how this tri-partition of the meaning of “citizenship” can be a useful device for decision makers so as to design as consistent policies as possible.

Discuss the main provisions of The Citizenship Act, 1955. What are the contemporary
debates on citizenship in India?
नागररकिा अधधतनयम, 1955 के प्रमुख प्रािधानों की वििेचना कीजजए। भारि में
नागररकिा पर र्मर्ामतयक िाद-वििाद क्या ैं?
3. Examine the procedure of appointment of judges in the higher judiciary (the Supreme
Court and High Courts) in India. Does the Collegium System ensure independence of the
higher judiciary? Explain.
भारि में उच्च नयायालयों (र्िोच्च नयायालय और उच्च नयायालयों) में नयायाधीर्शों की
तनयुजक्ि की प्रकिया का परीक्षर् कीजजए। क्या कॉलजजयम प्रर्ाली नयायाधीर्शों की
स्ििंत्रिा को र्ुतनजश्चि करिा ै? विश्लेषर् कीजजए।
4. Discuss the emergency powers of the President of India.
भारि के राष्रपति की आपािकालीन र्शजक्ियों की वििचना कीजजए।
5. Examine symmetrical and asymmetrical features of Indian federalism.
भारिीय र्ंघिाद की र्मममि और अर्मममि विर्शेषिाओं का परीक्षर् कीजजए।
6. Critically analyze various preventive detention laws in India and challenges posed by
them to the civil rights of citizens.
भारि के विमभनन तनिारक तनरोध कानूनों का आलोचनात्मक परीक्षर् कीजजए और
उन ोंनेनागररकों के नागररक अधधकारों के मलए ककर् प्रकार की चुनौिी प्रस्िुि की ै?