Witness Tried to Control the Court… Judge SHUTS It Down Instantly
Автор: Courtroom Justice
Загружено: 2026-02-09
Просмотров: 700
Описание:
In this courtroom proceeding, a self-represented witness appears before the judge after submitting sworn documents that potentially expose her to criminal liability. Despite repeated warnings from the court, she chooses to proceed without an attorney, explaining that she was denied a public defender and could not afford private legal counsel.
The central issue of the hearing revolves around her request for extensive ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accommodations based on PTSD and panic disorder. While the court acknowledges her mental health concerns and allows reasonable breaks, the judge firmly explains that many of her requests—such as controlling questioning tone, limiting testimony length, preventing credibility assessments, and restricting adversarial questioning—are not protected under ADA law.
As the hearing progresses, the judge clarifies that testimony must be given verbally under oath and that any affidavits or documents already filed with the court cannot be retracted or altered. The court also raises serious concerns that statements previously submitted by the witness may constitute an admission of perjury, emphasizing the legal risks of continuing without representation.
The judge methodically reviews each accommodation request, distinguishes between legal rights and personal preferences, and reinforces that credibility determinations rest solely with the court. While showing procedural fairness and patience, the judge ultimately denies most of the ADA demands and makes clear that emotional distress does not override courtroom rules or legal standards.
The hearing concludes with the judge reiterating that the case must move forward, that the court cannot force an attorney to take the case, and that the witness proceeds at her own legal risk. The exchange serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of self-representation and the strict limits of ADA protections within courtroom testimony.
⚖️ Disclaimer:
This video is for educational and commentary purposes only. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The content is based on public courtroom proceedings and should not be construed as legal advice.
#courtroomdrama #court #law #justice #justiceserved #courtroommoments #courtcases #karen
Повторяем попытку...
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео
-
Информация по загрузке: