How to Make Missing Fields Fail in RDLC Reports Testing

Описание: Learn how to handle missing fields in your RDLC reports during testing, ensuring that exceptions are raised for robust, reliable output.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/73887806/ asked by the user 'Dave Cousineau' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/621316/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/73887807/ provided by the user 'Dave Cousineau' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/621316/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to get missing fields to fail?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Make Missing Fields Fail in RDLC Reports Testing

When working with RDLC reports, ensuring that all your data fields are accurately represented can be challenging. This issue often becomes apparent during testing, especially when the reports render without raising exceptions despite missing fields. In this guide, we'll tackle this problem head-on, outlining how to identify discrepancies between your report fields and data types, ensuring that your tests fail when they should.

The Challenge at Hand

As a developer creating RDLC reports, you've likely faced scenarios where tests don't fail even if there are missing fields in the dataset. Instead of raising an error, the report simply displays empty values, making it hard to diagnose issues. This leads to the following question: How can you determine at test-time whether the fields in your data type match the report correctly?

Understanding RDLC Report Behavior

RDLC reports have specific behaviors that can lead to confusion:

Field References: During report rendering, only certain complex "visibility" expressions will throw exceptions for missing field references.

Textbox and Tablix Cells: Unfortunately, if a field is missing in these components, the report doesn't generate an error; it merely renders the value as empty, which doesn't help in pinpointing potential issues.

Additionally, RDLC reports do not readily expose field warnings via the LocalReport object, which complicates the testing process further.

The Solution: Intercepting Warnings at Test-Time

While RDLC does not invoke exceptions for missing fields in certain elements, it does generate warnings that are directed to debug output. You can capture these warnings and use them to create meaningful test failures. Here’s how you can implement this solution in your testing environment.

Step-by-Step Approach

Set Up Your LocalReport: Begin by establishing your LocalReport as you normally would.

Intercept Debug Output: Use a TextWriterTraceListener to capture and store any debug warnings generated during the report's rendering.

Render the Report: Call the Render method and handle the output properly.

Evaluate the Warnings: After rendering, check if there were any warnings captured.

Assert Conditions: If warnings exist, fail the test and return the warnings for easier debugging.

Example Code Snippet

Here’s how you can implement this in code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Note on Data Types

It's important to keep in mind that while this method helps identify missing fields, it does not address mismatched data types. A data type error will result in # Error displayed in the report and will not generate any warnings. Therefore, additional validation may be necessary to ensure that the data types used in the report align with those defined in your data source.

Conclusion

By understanding the RDLC reporting behavior and capturing debug output for missing fields, you can significantly enhance your testing of RDLC reports. This two-pronged approach not only assures you that your fields are correctly aligned but also helps catch errors before they manifest in production. Implement these practices and ensure that your reports are as robust and reliable as possible!

Quick Takeaways

Missing fields in RDLC do not generate exceptions by default.

Debug warnings can be captured to identify these issues during tests.

Ensure data types are also validated outside of RDLC's error handling.

By following these guidelines, you can elevate the reliability of your reports and ensure that your output meets the expected standards every single time.