IRAN CAN OUTLAST U.S. MILITARY MIGHT /Lt Col Daniel Davis

Описание: ** NEW MERCH ** Jackets & Sweatshirts, Thermo Mugs!!
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavis...

Lt Col Daniel Davis says that during the war in Afghanistan he discovered senior leaders—especially David Petraeus—were misleading Congress and the American public by claiming progress that didn’t exist. After seeing conditions firsthand while deployed, he concluded the war effort was failing and soldiers were dying for no real strategic gain, which pushed him to speak out publicly.

Turning to the current conflict with Iran, he argues that Donald Trump likely wants an exit from the war and is setting up a narrative to claim victory and withdraw. Trump suggested the U.S. struck because advisers like Jared Kushner and others warned of a potential Iranian attack, but intelligence reports reportedly indicated there was no imminent threat.

The speaker believes Trump made a serious mistake by relying on political advisers instead of military leaders. Now, he says, Trump is trapped:

Continuing the war risks more casualties, economic damage, and political fallout at home.

Ending it could create conflict with Israel, which has stronger incentives to keep fighting.

He also argues the U.S. lacks a clear military path to victory against Iran. Without a massive ground invasion—something the U.S. does not have the forces or political support to conduct—bombing alone cannot force Iran to surrender. Iran’s strategy is simply to survive and keep retaliating, which historically has been enough to defeat stronger powers in long wars (as with Vietnam and Afghanistan).

The speaker concludes that the war offers no strategic benefit to the United States and will likely leave the country worse off regardless of how it ends. He claims the primary beneficiary would be Israeli leadership—especially Benjamin Netanyahu—who he says has long pushed for confrontation with Iran. Meanwhile, American troops have already been killed or wounded in a conflict he argues was avoidable and unrelated to U.S. national security.

Bottom line:
The interview argues that the Iran war was a strategic mistake, lacks achievable objectives, and has put Trump in a political and military trap with no easy exit.