Resolving Rounding Issues with Numba's @ jit in Python

Описание: Discover how to solve rounding problems in your Numba-compiled functions by using proper type annotations with the `@ jit` decorator in Python.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63962773/ asked by the user 'Guilherme Cruz' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5892978/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63963252/ provided by the user 'Guilherme Cruz' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5892978/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why does @ jit is rounding my function result?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Rounding Issues with Numba's @ jit

When working with Python for scientific computing, performance is often a critical consideration. Many developers turn to the Numba library to accelerate their code, especially when using functions involving numerical computations. However, while employing the @ jit decorator intentioned for just-in-time compilation, some users encounter unexpected issues, such as results being rounded unexpectedly. Let's explore this problem in detail, and how you can solve it effectively.

The Problem Observed

One user shared the following scenario: they defined a function using the @ jit decorator and noticed that the results appeared rounded. Specifically, when calling the function with an input, the non-jitted version provided a precise result, whereas the jitted version returned a rounded figure. Here is the context:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Without the @ jit, calling u(10) returned 0.249975, while with @ jit, the output was simply 0.25. The user was puzzled as to why this rounding was happening and sought assistance to maintain precision in their results.

Understanding the Cause of Rounding

The rounding observed is typically due to implicit data type handling in Numba when not properly specified. By default, if Numba cannot determine the appropriate return type accurately, it may default to a lesser precision type—like float32, leading to unexpected results.

Why Does This Happen?

Interpolation of Types: When compiling, Numba attempts to determine the function's output type dynamically. If it misinterprets this, it may produce a float with fewer decimal places.

Numeric Constants: Without type specifications, operations might lead to precision loss, especially in floating-point arithmetic.

The Solution to the Rounding Issue

To fix this rounding issue, it's crucial to explicitly declare the return type of the function using the @ jit decorator. Here's how you can do that effectively:

Step-by-Step Fix

Specify the Return Type: Modify the decorator to include an explicit type definition for the return value. You should choose float64 for enhanced precision.

Update the Function: Here’s the corrected implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Update

Decorator Modification: By adding "float64(float64)", you inform Numba that this function will take a float64 as input and return a float64. This eliminates any ambiguity regarding data types.

Increased Precision: With the explicit return type declared, Numba has the right context to retain the precision across numerical operations and avoids rounding issues.

Conclusion

In summary, if you're encountering rounding issues with your functions compiled using Numba's @ jit, the solution lies in explicitly declaring the return type of the function. As shown, applying these changes ensures that your function can perform as expected, maintaining necessary precision in its results. Happy coding!