Unlocking EF Core Query Performance: The Power of Reflection in C#

Описание: Discover how to optimize EF Core query performance using Reflection in C# . Learn about the differences between traditional and optimized methods for querying a database efficiently.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68403130/ asked by the user 'MrWalrus' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12017583/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68406766/ provided by the user 'Ivan Stoev' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5202563/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Using Reflection to build EF Core query is faster than to using reflection

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Unlocking EF Core Query Performance: The Power of Reflection in C#

Performance is critical when it comes to querying databases, especially in applications that handle large data sets. As developers, we often seek ways to streamline our queries to improve processing times. In this article, we'll explore a question that's been on many developers' minds: Is using Reflection to build EF Core queries really faster than traditional methods?

The Problem at Hand

You've set up an extension method to simplify querying on multiple fields with minimal boilerplate code, aiming to reduce your workload. This method, WherePropertyIsLikeIfStringIsNotEmpty, uses Reflection and Expressions to modify your queries dynamically based on search values. While it successfully returns expected results, you have noticed potential performance concerns. To investigate further, you set up benchmarks with an in-memory database, leading to some surprising results. Your extension method outperformed the traditional querying method by a margin of over ten times!

Analyzing the Performance Results

You conducted a benchmark that yielded the following results:

MethodMeanFilterUsingExtension73.73 usFilterTraditionally1,036.60 usThese results indicate that your use of reflection and expressions is not only functional but remarkably efficient. But what accounts for this performance boost?

Understanding the Performance Differences

Expression Tree Building:

Both the traditional and extension methods build query expression trees at runtime. However, the traditional method generated closures instead of constant expressions. Closures can introduce overhead due to additional heap allocations and the need to capture variables.

In contrast, your extension method emits constant expressions that are processed more quickly by LINQ to Objects.

Query Processing Stage:

When using traditional expressions like EF.Functions.Like(x.Value, $"%{SearchValue1}%"), you're relying on the overhead of string.Format at runtime, which ultimately slows down execution. This is contrasted with your extension method’s approach which directly binds constant values, reducing processing overhead and compiling the expression more efficiently.

Impact of Small Data Sets:

Note that benchmarking with an in-memory database using small data sets may not fully represent real-world scenarios where SQL execution dominates time due to the vast amounts of data being retrieved from a real database.

Optimizing the Extension Method

To further enhance your extension method's performance, consider implementing static reflection caching and providing the option to use either constant or variable patterns. Here’s a streamlined version of your method:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Takeaways from Benchmarking

Optimized Extension Method:

Using constants in the optimized method was the fastest, followed closely by the original extension method, validating that reflection indeed doesn't hinder performance severely.

Real Database Considerations:

Always keep in mind that execution in a real database typically showcases different performance metrics due to query execution and data retrieval overheads.

Variable vs. Constant:

While using variables provides flexibility, constant expressions often yield speed advantages in specific scenarios—be mindful of your specific use case when implementing optimizations.

Conclusion

Using Reflection and Expressions to create EF Core queries can lead to significant performance improvements when executed correctly. As demonstrated in your initial benchmarks, the structure of expressions and how they execute plays a crucial role in per