Einstein was wrong? MIT Experiment comment to comment of Sabine Hossenfelder

Описание: Sabine explains the MIT interference experiment perfectly(   • New Experiment Explains Why We Don't See Q...  ).
In this video I show a complementary wave-based view (HSF) that predicts the loss of interference from first principles — no observers, no interpretations, just physics.

Core idea:
When the atom lattice becomes free (trap off), it can store tiny phase-shifts from the photon.
Interference requires a perfectly stable background. Once the lattice + background field begin to shift, coherence breaks.

Simple wave logic (ASCII):
Photon wave: Psi_2(t,x)
Atom-lattice: Psi_3(t,x)
Background field: Psi_4(t,x)

Total wave:
Psi_total = Psi_2 + Psi_3 + Psi_4

Interference stable if:
d/dt phase_overlap(Psi_2 , Psi_3+Psi_4) ≈ 0


When atoms are released:

Psi_3, Psi_4 shift
→ they absorb phase
→ coherence ↓
→ interference fades

HSF channel frequencies (uncoupled basis):
| Channel | ω (1/s) | f = ω/2π (Hz) |
|---------|-------------|----------------|
| K1 – Fermionic | 7.763e20 | 1.236e20 |
| K2 – Electromagnetic | 1.553e21 | 2.471e20 |
| K3 – Collective | 3.105e21 | 4.942e20 |
| K4 – Neutrofield | 6.211e21 | 9.885e20 |
| K5 – Cosmological | 1.242e22 | 1.977e21 |


These frequencies form a strict binary harmonic scaling (×2 each step).
The experiment becomes easy to understand when you treat photon (K2), lattice (K3), and its slow stabilizer (K4) as a coupled wave system.

theory: https://zenodo.org/records/17652836