Rubin Report — Candace Owens & Blaire White Debate Social Autopsy and Online Harms

Описание: When internet outrage outpaces facts, reputations get torn and nuance disappears.

Dave Rubin brought Candace Owens and Blair White together to move past the pile-on and actually figure out what Social Autopsy was, what it meant, and what it did. Candace explains plainly why she conceived Social Autopsy: to archive public online statements so schools and communities could see patterns without ruining lives. "I realized it was going to be politicized and it was going to become a weapon that I never intend." Blair pushes back: "If you share someone else's personal information without their consent, it is doxing."

The conversation examines whether Social Autopsy ever became a functional database or was just a demo, a "splash page" used to raise funds for technology never built. Candace insists the project never launched: "I didn't dox anyone. I never doxed anyone." Blair and others warn centralizing names, photos, and school or workplace ties provides a ready list for bad actors. Both sides acknowledge something harmful happened; intent does not erase consequence. The debate moves to accountability, transparency, and the need for clearer communications.

Topics:
Online harassment and doxxing dynamics
Digital platform responsibilities
Media literacy and critical thinking
Intellectual accountability in political debates
Tech project governance and transparency
politics
current events
censorship and free expression online
society and culture

This video is an original summary and commentary intended for educational purposes and is not a substitute for the original podcast.

Watch the full episode on YouTube:    • Candace Owens & Blaire White Debate Social...