Order 23 Rule 3 CPC Explained | Challenge to Compromise Decrees | Supreme Court Ruling 2025
Автор: Law In Motion
Загружено: 2025-04-26
Просмотров: 647
Описание:
📢 In Sakina Sultanali Sunesara v. Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj & Ors. [2025 LiveLaw (SC) 489], the Supreme Court delivered a crucial ruling on how parties can challenge compromise decrees.
The Court, led by Justices Vikram Nath and Prasanna B. Varale, clarified that:
Parties cannot directly appeal a compromise decree before the Appellate Court.
Section 96(3) CPC bars appeals against consent decrees.
Order 23 Rule 3 CPC mandates approaching the Trial Court first.
Order 43 Rule 1-A does not create an independent right of appeal.
In this video, we break down the case facts, Supreme Court's reasoning, and the implications for civil litigation practice in India. 🚀
🔔 Stay updated on the latest legal developments by subscribing to Law-In-Motion!
#SupremeCourt #CivilProcedure #Order23Rule3 #Section96CPC #CompromiseDecree #IndianLaw #LegalUpdates2025
Повторяем попытку...
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео
-
Информация по загрузке:
