Keir Starmer HUMILIATED as King Charles WIPES THE FLOOR With Him!!!

Описание: Who does the King really serve — the Prime Minister, or the people?

As tensions rise over Greenland, Donald Trump, and Denmark, a far deeper constitutional question is being ignored here at home.

With a proposed royal visit to the United States in 2026 to mark 250 years since the Declaration of Independence, King Charles III now finds himself caught in a political and constitutional dilemma — one that exposes the true state of British sovereignty.

In this video, I break down:

Why the monarch’s constitutional duty is tied to the Prime Minister

How Keir Starmer siding with Denmark over Greenland has wider implications

Why royal neutrality is no longer neutral when sovereignty is at stake

How Trump’s Greenland rhetoric has triggered a diplomatic powder keg

Why Britain is once again being pulled into global conflicts not of its making

We also look at:

The role of the Crown in appointing (and theoretically dismissing) a Prime Minister

Whether the monarchy has been deliberately neutered over time

The ignored constitutional safeguards:

Bill of Rights

Act of Settlement

Coronation Oath

Claim of Right

Petition of Right

Most importantly, we ask the question no one in Westminster wants to answer:

👉 When the Prime Minister abandons the constitution…
👉 When sovereignty is quietly handed away…
👉 When foreign alignment overrides national interest…

Is it the monarch’s duty to intervene — or to comply?

Britain has far more constitutional and historical ties to America than to Brussels.
Yet this government’s instinct is always Europe first — regardless of law, mandate, or consequence.

If we surrender sovereignty, we surrender security.
And when global flashpoints erupt — Britain will be dragged straight into the middle.

👇 Watch the full breakdown and tell me honestly:
Is the King protecting the constitution — or presiding over its erosion?

💬 Comment your view
👍 Like & share
🔔 Subscribe for more constitutional reality checks