2-Year Rust Test: WD-40 vs Strike — Fertilizer Spreader Corrosion Experiment

Описание: This video shows a real 2-year corrosion comparison between two fertilizer spreaders exposed to nitrogen fertilizer — one treated with WD-40 and the other protected with Strike (StrikeHold).

The farmer explains how:

The WD-40–treated unit rusted quickly

Bolts, linkages, and moving parts corroded and failed

Even with washing and repeated WD-40 coatings, the machine deteriorated

In contrast, the Strike-protected spreader looks almost brand-new two years later

No bolt rust, no mechanism lock-ups, no structural corrosion

This real-world demonstration shows how corrosive nitrogen fertilizer can be — and how Strike’s protective coating outperforms WD-40 by bonding deeper, resisting wash-off, and preventing oxidation at the molecular level.

🔧 What This Video Demonstrates

Long-term rust resistance

Real farm equipment exposure

WD-40 vs Strike (StrikeHold) comparison

Why traditional oils fail against fertilizer corrosion

How Strike prevents oxidation before it begins

🧴 Want to Protect Your Own Equipment?

Learn more about StrikeHold at:
https://www.strikehold.com

📺 Subscribe for More Real-World Tests

We run ongoing corrosion challenges, side-by-side material tests, and live rust experiments in multiple liquids and environments.