Consequence Clout-Chases Pusha T—But Who’s Really Losing Here?

Описание: On Hot 97, Consequence unleashed a PR-fed rant, accusing Pusha T of dragging Kanye West into the Drake beef for clout—then dropped alleged texts to prove it.

But let’s be clear: Pusha T apologized, not out of respect, but because those lyrics were earned. What’s disturbing is how Kanye looks way more defensively fragile here.

In this video, I break down:

Why this feels like a desperate bid for attention

The real disrespect here—Consequence’s clout chase

How Push’s apology doesn’t equate to weakness or betrayal

If you’re over the noise and want clarity, this one’s for you.

#Consequence #PushaT #Hot97 #CloutChasing #HipHopAuthenticity #Kanye #RapCulture

Instagram: instagram.com/myhumbleopinion00
Cash App: $myhumbleopinion00


*Disclaimer:*

The content on this channel is for informational and entertainment purposes only. All statements and discussions are based on publicly available information, personal opinions, or commentary. Everything discussed should be considered alleged unless verified independently.

I am not making any claims, accusations, or providing professional advice of any kind. I encourage viewers to do their own research, seek out multiple sources, and form their own conclusions.

Thank you for watching, and always approach topics with critical thinking and an open mind!

Fair Use Disclaimer:
This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. All clips used are protected by the Fair Use Doctrine within Title 17 of the United States Code. This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review and news reporting. Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator.
Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015)