Who remains "safe" in the elections of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA)?

Описание: #Tibet election
#penpa Tsering
#Kelsang Dorjee Aukatsang
#Gyalthang Ngawang Gaden
#Tsering Phuntsok
TIB:https://vr-news.net/?p=3155
For years, voters in CTA elections have clearly witnessed an unavoidable reality:

Within the current electoral system, not everyone is bound by the same standards and the same level of scrutiny.

In past elections and the handling of related disputes, the following scenarios have repeatedly emerged:

The first scenario is "clear accusations but no investigation."

In some election cycles, accusations against candidates or incumbent officials have met the basic requirements—written complaints, a timeline, witnesses, or technical doubts—but the election commission has not initiated an independent investigation as required by law. Instead, it has shelved the matter with excuses such as "still under evaluation," "insufficient evidence," or "not accepted," ultimately leaving it unresolved.

The second scenario is "prolonged disputes but no conclusion."

Some disputes involving procedural fairness, resource usage, technical systems, or campaign practices have been repeatedly raised in multiple election cycles, yet no public conclusion has been reached, and no precedent has been established for subsequent handling. This "inconclusive state" objectively equates to the assumption that problems can be resolved over time.