C+ + Interface Design: How to Avoid Code Duplication in Event Management

Описание: Discover how to design a clean and efficient C+ + interface for managing events without duplicating code. Learn best practices for maintaining a clear architecture with inheritance.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70376693/ asked by the user 'kaaldir' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10691188/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70376967/ provided by the user 'Jarod42' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2684539/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: C+ + Interface, What's the best way to not duplicate code

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
C+ + Interface Design: How to Avoid Code Duplication in Event Management

In the realm of software development, especially when dealing with C+ + , one common challenge developers face is the duplication of code. This often occurs while managing different event operations, each having its unique behavior. If you've ever found yourself in a similar situation, you're not alone.

This post explores a practical example of how to efficiently manage event operations using interfaces, thus reducing redundancy and enhancing the maintainability of your code.

Understanding the Problem

Consider a scenario: You have an Event Manager that processes various event types, each requiring a method called do() to implement different actions. For instance, let’s take a look at two events:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, both EventX and EventY possess two attributes, Object a and Object b. Each class has its specific implementation of the do() function. However, this design leads to numerous duplications, especially if many event types follow this pattern.

The Need for a Solution

The core requirement is to create a mechanism that allows for calling the do() function not just from a to b, but also in the reverse direction if the bothSide attribute is set to true. The challenge lies in achieving this in a manner that is clean, organized, and devoid of code duplication.

The Solution: Introducing an Event Interface

To tackle the issue of duplication, we can introduce an additional layer of abstraction with a new interface. Here’s how it can be done.

Step 1: Create an Abstract Base Class

First, we need to create an abstract class that will serve as the base for the events:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this structure:

The do() function is defined in the base class and handles the logic for invoking actions based on the bothSide attribute.

The action() method is declared as a pure virtual function, which means derived classes must implement this to specify what action should be taken.

Step 2: Implement Derived Event Classes

Now, we can implement the derived classes without duplicating the event handling code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In these implementations:

Each EventX and EventY class simply overrides the action() method to provide its specific implementation.

The do() method, already present in the base class, remains unchanged and manages the core logic.

Advantages of This Approach

By following this structure, you can achieve several key benefits:

Reduced Code Duplication: Common logic resides in the base class, eliminating the need to write repetitive code in each event class.

Enhanced Maintainability: Changes or enhancements can be made in one location (the base class), ensuring consistency across all event types.

Flexibility and Scalability: New event types can be added easily with minimal impact on the existing codebase.

Conclusion

In conclusion, by introducing an abstract class that encapsulates common functionality while allowing for specific actions through derived classes, we not only resolve the issue of code duplication but also foster a cleaner and more efficient architecture. This pattern is a valuable pattern in C+ + development, especially in complex systems involving multiple event types.

Adopting such strategies in your own projects can lead to more maintainable and scalable codebases. Happy coding!