OM System 8-25mm vs 7-14mm PRO – Which Ultra-Wide Lens Is Best?

Описание: Choosing between the OM System 8-25mm F4 PRO and the OM System 7-14mm F2.8 PRO is one of the biggest decisions Micro Four Thirds photographers face—so in this video, I take both lenses into the real world to compare features, handling, image quality, long exposure performance, and everyday usability.

A few months ago, I chose the 8-25mm F4 PRO as my main ultra-wide lens. Today, I’m putting the 7-14mm F2.8 PRO to the test to see what I missed… and whether I made the right choice.
This video covers build quality, filter compatibility, long exposure landscapes, close-focus “macro-style” shots, and real-world shooting with both lenses on the OM System OM-1.
If you're trying to decide which Micro Four Thirds ultra-wide zoom is best for you, this is the comparison you need.

📷 Lenses Compared

OM System 8-25mm F4 PRO

Full-frame equivalent: 16–50mm
Accepts screw-in filters (ND, polariser)
Extending zoom design
Extremely sharp across the frame
Versatile focal range for landscapes & everyday use
Great for long exposure photography

OM System 7-14mm F2.8 PRO

Full-frame equivalent: 14–28mm
Constant f/2.8 aperture for low-light & astrophotography
Internal zoom (doesn’t extend)
Built-in lens hood + weather sealing
Ultra-wide focal length for dramatic landscapes
Close focusing for macro-style shots
Downside: No standard filter threads

📸 What’s in This Video
Why I originally chose the 8-25mm
The real-world limitation of the 7-14mm: filter handling
Long exposure testing using Live ND mode
Shooting ultra-wide landscapes at the coast
Close-focus “macro-ish” bubble shots
How wide is too wide for landscapes?
Weather sealing in harsh coastal conditions
Image examples from both lenses
Final thoughts: which lens suits different types of photographers

🎞 Best Lens For…
Choose the 8-25mm F4 PRO if you:
Love long exposures
Depend on polarising filters & NDs
Want a more flexible zoom range
Prefer a lens that can replace multiple focal lengths
Choose the 7-14mm F2.8 PRO if you:
Shoot astrophotography
Want the widest rectilinear view without fisheye distortion
Don’t rely heavily on filters
Enjoy dramatic architecture or ultra-wide creativity

✨ Final Thoughts
Both lenses are fantastic performers, but they excel in different areas. For my style—long exposure coastal photography—the 8-25mm remains the standout choice. However, the 7-14mm is an exceptional lens for anyone who prioritises low-light performance, extreme width, and creative close-focus options.

👍 Enjoyed This Video?
Please Like, Subscribe, and drop a comment telling me which lens YOU prefer and why!
Your support helps bring more Micro Four Thirds content to the channel every week.

Buy here lenses and save up to £600 with cash back:

https://clk.tradedoubler.com/click?p=...

OM System Summer Camera Cashback Offer:

https://clk.tradedoubler.com/click?p=...


Join this channel to get access to perks:
   / @chrisbaitsonphoto  

• Visit My Website:
https://www.chrisbaitson.co.uk
• Buy Me A Coffee:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/chrispikz
• My Camera Gear:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/shop/chrisba...
•Follow Me On Instagram:
  / chrispikz  
• Buy My PRINTS here:
https://www.redbubble.com/people/chri...

•About me:
My name is Chris and I am a landscape photographer from East Yorkshire focussing on coastal long exposures using my micro four thirds Olympus cameras.

My music is provided my Audiio, sign up below and use code SAVE70 to earn 70% off of your first 12 month subscription:

https://audiio.com/partner?oid=1&affi...

#microfourthids #landscapephotography #cameras