Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar Explained | Guidelines on Arrests | Landmark Judgment in Hindi

Описание: In this episode of Case Law Analysis by ClassMax, we explain the landmark Supreme Court judgment Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) — a case that fundamentally changed how police arrests are made in India.

The Supreme Court clearly held that arrest is not mandatory in every criminal case and issued strict guidelines under CrPC Section 41 and 41A to prevent arbitrary and illegal arrests, especially in cases involving Section 498A IPC.

🔍 In this video, you will learn:

Background and facts of Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar
Why the Supreme Court intervened in arrest procedures
Meaning and scope of “Arrest is Not Mandatory”
Supreme Court arrest guidelines for police officers
Role of CrPC Section 41 & 41A
Impact of the judgment on 498A cases

Why this case is extremely important for law students, judiciary aspirants, and police authorities
-This judgment is frequently asked in judiciary exams, law school exams, and interviews, making it a must-know case law.

📚 Who should watch this video?
Law students
Judiciary aspirants
Legal professionals
Anyone interested in criminal law and constitutional safeguards

🔔 Subscribe to @TheClassMax for simplified explanations of landmark and recent Supreme Court judgments.

Website: https://www.classmax.in
Blog: https://blog.classmax.in
Instagarm:   / classmax.in  
LinkedIn:   / theclassmax  
Facebook:   / classmax.in  
WhatsApp: https://www.whatsapp.com/channel/0029...



Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar
Arnesh Kumar case explained
Arrest is not mandatory
Supreme Court arrest guidelines
CrPC Section 41 explained
CrPC Section 41A
Section 498A arrest rules
Illegal arrest Supreme Court
Case law analysis India
Criminal law case law
Landmark Supreme Court judgment
Arrest guidelines police India
Judiciary exam case laws
Law students case law