Is Quran’s Logic Better Than 17 Centuries of Creed ❓😱💬Hijab Confronts Craig 😶‍🌫️🔥

Описание: Is Quran’s Logic Better Than 17 Centuries of Creed? ❓😱💬 Hijab Confronts Craig 😶‍🌫️🔥 #shorts


In this gripping debate, Muhammad Hijab challenges Dr. William Lane Craig on the coherence of Christian doctrine versus the logic of the Quran. Hijab accuses Craig of indirectly affirming Quranic reasoning over 1,700 years of Christian tradition, particularly regarding the eternal begotten Son, a cornerstone of the Nicene Creed.

Hijab argues that Craig’s rejection of the eternal generation of the Son aligns with the Quran’s assertion of God’s self-sufficiency, independence, and necessity. The Quran explicitly states, “He begets not, nor is He begotten,” which Hijab claims is more philosophically coherent than the Christian Trinitarian concept upheld by Protestant, Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox traditions.

Dr. Craig defends his stance, asserting that his understanding of the Trinity is rooted in the New Testament rather than creedal formulations like the Nicene Creed. However, Hijab presses Craig to openly admit that his views align more with the Quran than with mainstream Christian dogma. This confrontation sets the stage for an intense discussion on theology, scripture, and the evolution of Christian doctrine.

The debate highlights significant theological and philosophical tensions between Islam and Christianity. Hijab’s insistence on addressing these contradictions provokes questions about the foundations of Christian belief and its divergence from early church teachings. Meanwhile, Craig emphasizes his commitment to scripture over tradition, sparking further intrigue about the implications for interfaith dialogue.

Whether you’re a student of theology, philosophy, or interfaith discussions, this video offers an intellectually stimulating exchange. Watch the full debate to witness two sharp minds tackle age-old questions about God’s nature, coherence, and the intersection of faith and reason. Share your thoughts in the comments—whose arguments resonate with you?


William Lane Craig, Muhammad Hijab, Quran vs. Nicene Creed, theological debate, eternal begotten Son, God’s independence, Quranic logic, Christian dogma, Islamic reasoning, interfaith dialogue, philosophy of God, Protestant Christianity, Catholic beliefs, Eastern Orthodox doctrine, Quran and Bible comparison, theological confrontation, Hijab vs. Craig debate, Nicene Creed challenged, 1,700 years of Christian tradition, Quran on God’s nature, Trinity doctrine debate, Islamic critique of Christianity, scripture vs. tradition, theological philosophy, interfaith theology discussion, Tawhid vs. Trinity, Christian history challenged, Quran Bible theological discussion, Hijab questions Craig, philosophical implications of God, God’s self-sufficiency, Quranic consistency, comparative theology, Christian doctrine critique.



Is Quran’s reasoning better than the Nicene Creed?

Muhammad Hijab vs. William Lane Craig full debate

Quran vs. Bible on God’s independence

Eternal begotten Son challenged by Hijab

Interfaith dialogue on Trinity and Tawhid

Hijab debates Dr. Craig on Quranic reasoning

Christian and Islamic perspectives on God

Quran and Nicene Creed theological comparison

Islam vs. Christianity: Debate on God’s nature

Hijab questions Craig on Christian dogma



Hijab vs. Craig debate highlights

Quranic logic vs. Nicene Creed

Eternal Son in Quran and Christianity

Tawhid vs. Trinity discussion

Quran on God’s independence explained

Hijab challenges Craig’s beliefs

Christian doctrine vs. Quranic reasoning

Nicene Creed debated by Hijab

Islam vs. Christianity debate clips

Hijab questions Craig on Trinity