Understanding Deepcopy in Python: Why Do Some Int Values Share IDs?

Описание: Explore the concept of `deepcopy` in Python and uncover why certain integer values do not have unique object IDs when using this method.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/67236586/ asked by the user 'jaideep' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5183398/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67236669/ provided by the user 'quamrana' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4834/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why Deepcopy in Python not creating new objects for single int values?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Deepcopy in Python: Why Do Some Int Values Share IDs?

When working with Python, you may come across the term deepcopy, which is a method used to create copies of objects. However, you might find yourself puzzled when you notice that deepcopy doesn't seem to create new objects for single integer values. In this post, we will clarify this concept and explain why certain integer values can share IDs even after being copied.

What is Deepcopy?

Deepcopy is a function provided by the copy module in Python. It is designed to create a new compound object and recursively insert copies of the objects found in the original. This is particularly useful when dealing with nested structures like lists or dictionaries, as it ensures that modifications made to the copied object do not affect the original object.

Example of deepcopy

Consider the following initial code snippet:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When this code runs, it shows that the IDs for x[0] and y[0] are the same as well as x[1] and y[1], yet x[2] does not share the same ID as y[2]. This raises an interesting question: why does this happen?

The Concept of Immutable Objects

To delve deeper into this, we need to understand the concept of immutable objects in Python. Integers, strings, and tuples are immutable types. This means that their values cannot change; whenever you modify these types, Python creates a new instance of the object. However, small integers (in the range of -5 to 256) are cached by Python, leading to them reusing existing objects to optimize memory usage.

Why IDs Are Shared for Small Integers

In the above example:

x[0] and y[0] both represent the integer 1.

x[1] and y[1] both represent the integer 2.

These integers fall within the cached range, which is why deepcopy does not create new instances of them. As a result, both x[0] and y[0] will point to the same memory location (ID), which is evident in the output:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In contrast, the third item, which is a list containing mutable objects, does get its distinct ID because it is not a cached integer.

A Deeper Example: Custom Objects

To further illustrate the behavior of deepcopy, let’s examine a case with custom object instances:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Expected Output

This code snippet demonstrates that the IDs of all objects differ between x and y, confirming that a deepcopy creates entirely new instances of these custom objects.

Conclusion

In summary, the reason some integer values share IDs when using deepcopy in Python is due to the underlying behavior of the language’s handling of immutable types, particularly through caching. Understanding this can help you better utilize the deepcopy functionality in your programs and avoid potential pitfalls related to object references.

If you’re venturing into complex data structures where mutable and immutable types coexist, knowing these details will make your programming journey smoother.