Defamation, Disinformation, SLAPPs and Democracy

Описание: Defamation, Disinformation, SLAPPs and Democracy: How defamation law can both threaten and protect public discourse

The recent libel case brought by Dominion Voting systems against Fox News shows how defamation law can be used to put the record straight and hold to account those who have spread falsehoods that can damage democracy. However, there is now a lively debate as to whether the US Sullivan test makes it too easy for false and dangerous narratives concerning public figures to enter public discourse. Several other democracies have more limited defences, protecting responsible journalism on matters of legitimate public concern; however, critics argue that their lack of hard-edged protection ‘chills’ public interest journalism.

There is also growing recognition of the problem of SLAPPs (Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation) – cases brought by wealthy individuals or corporations to stifle investigative journalism into their suspected wrongdoing. The recent prison sentence for libel handed to an Opposition leader in India is a stark reminder of how defamation law can be a potent anti-democratic tool.

The above issues are discussed by speakers from India, South Africa, the UK and the US. Rather than using formal presentations, this roundtable was a moderated conversation, with speakers engaging with each other and questions and comments from the floor.