Better Than Bug Spray. Plant Once, Protected Forever — Why Don't Nurseries Sell This?
Автор: DTD History Radio
Загружено: 2026-03-07
Просмотров: 803
Описание:
Better Than Bug Spray. Plant Once, Protected Forever — Why Don't Nurseries Sell This?
In 1947, a USDA entomologist documented a flower so effective at repelling insects that field workers planting it alongside crops reported zero pest pressure for entire growing seasons.
No spraying. No chemicals. No protective equipment. Just a flower.
The same year, DDT — a synthetic insecticide developed from WWII nerve agent research — was being aggressively marketed to American farmers. By 1950, chemical companies had invested $400 million in pesticide production infrastructure.
A flower that repels every insect for free had no place in that system.
The flower: Pyrethrum Daisy (Tanacetum cinerariifolium) — the original source of pyrethrin insecticides — but used as a living plant, not an extracted chemical. Combined with its companion: Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) — a roadside "weed" classified as noxious in 9 U.S. states that repels over 50 insect species including mosquitoes, flies, ants, aphids, Colorado potato beetles, and Japanese beetles — all simultaneously, all season, all for free.
The $16 billion pesticide industry sells you synthetic versions of compounds these flowers produce naturally. Then classifies the flowers themselves as weeds. Then charges you $15 per bottle for what grows freely in your garden.
💰 THE MARKET THEY PROTECT: U.S. residential pesticide market: $3.2 billion annually Average American household pesticide spending: $180-240/year U.S. agricultural pesticide market: $12.8 billion annually Total U.S. pesticide market: $16 billion annually
Companies protecting this market:
Bayer (absorbed Monsanto 2018): $19.8 billion total crop science revenue
Syngenta (owned by ChemChina): $13.1 billion revenue
BASF Agricultural Solutions: $8.2 billion revenue
Corteva (DowDuPont spin-off): $6.3 billion revenue
Combined lobbying expenditure (2022): $127 million University agricultural research funding: $890 million annually
A $15 flower bed that eliminates $240/year in pesticide purchases — permanently — represents billions in lost recurring revenue across 130 million U.S. households.
This is why university extension offices funded by chemical companies teach spray schedules — never companion planting. This is why Tansy is classified as a noxious weed. This is why Pyrethrum Daisy was removed from commercial seed catalogs between 1960-1980.
The suppression doesn't need conspiracy. It just needs money flowing in the right direction.
📚 SOURCES: Casida, John E., and Gary B. Quistad. "Pyrethrum Flowers: Production, Chemistry, Toxicology, and Uses." Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 43, no. 11 (1995): 2675–2683. Duke, Stephen O. "Natural Pesticides from Plants." Advances in New Crops (1990): 511–517. Isman, Murray B. "Plant Essential Oils for Pest and Disease Management." Crop Protection 19, no. 8 (2000): 603–608. Pickett, John A., et al. "Push-Pull Farming System." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369 (2014): 20120281. Pyrethrins Joint Assessment of Commodity Chemicals. WHO Environmental Health Criteria 82. Geneva: WHO, 1989. Regnault-Roger, Catherine, et al. Biopesticides of Plant Origin. Intercept/Lavoisier, 2005. Rodale Institute. Companion Planting for Pest Management. Rodale Press, 2017. Tunsjø, Hege Sundet, et al. "Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) as Insect Repellent." Phytochemistry 131 (2016): 77–86.
#naturalrepellent #pestcontrol #forgottenplants #pyrethrum #tansy #companionplanting #organicgardening #permaculture #homesteading #pesticidefree #chemicalindustry #foodsovereignty
Повторяем попытку...
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео
-
Информация по загрузке: