Property tax Rodeo Ride, biased and impartial. Violation of Canon 2.2 and assessment laws.

Описание: Unedited Formal Hearing property tax appeal. Petitioner did not participate due to an illness.
Denied an extension
Denied objections and rebuttal by motion of apposing attorney granted by the commissioner. Evidence with anotations where skipped over.


See video link that shows what was concealed as submitted evidence and perjurious testimony by respondents.

28 Exhibit’s submitted, 8 exhibits entered into the record. Most where skipped over, those that where shown where not discussed in the context of.

6:50 email is testimony which was not discussed, concealed evidence.


19:00 video was concealed.

19:48 All Audio files concealed recorded by the Assessor are legal.


59:13 Highlighted it stated “most of the main floor has been remodeled, they’re guess was 75%. Exact was 80.41% raised the value $129,200 over 2017 assessment.
Missing evidence was dated photos of the ONLY remodel for the tax year being Master bedroom, the bathroom, one other small bedroom. 504 ft.² 19.59% was the only remodel raised the value $130,700. By law 59-2-1004 (1) (f) It was not a qualified change.
Respondents saw those images 51 days before this zoom hearing.
Submitted as evidence it was concealed. That would’ve been my PowerPoint denied Objections and rebuttals.

1:02:22 Claimed it was an estate court sale. Warranty deed submitted did not show up in the record proving it was an arms length transaction.

1:08:45. The kitchen, family room, living room, 2 bathrooms, hallway, a bedroom was remodeled in 2016 stated in the 2018 decision as “most of the main floor has been remodeled “

1:13:21 There were no rambler sales within the neighborhood why I chose as closest possible as did the appraiser his are just as close as the assessors comparables.

1:30:42 15 photos of poor workmanship skipped and concealed . Shown in link video and dated video of basement not shown in formal hearing. They asserted poor is a structural issue. To make light of a basement In need of full renovation. Their Conditions Chart is skipped, concealed.

1:33:37 Called it an estate court sale based on the 2018 decision. It is not stated in the 2018 decision!Perjurious testimony, not backed up by any evidence. Submission of the Warranty Deed concealed, an arms length transaction

1:34:18 Historical assessment increases of neighbors 0 to 4% ours was 19.4% , none of this document was discussed in context of. It included the assessors assessment values.

Exhibit 5: Skipped over my notes on Appraisal document

Exhibit 6: none of comments discussed, only mentions poor

Exhibit 7: Board of equalization decision with my annotations and notes skipped over not shown concealed as evidence.

Exhibit 9: My email submitted the day before the zoom was not shown nor discussed in the hearing. By the law of evidence any “thing or item” that is not shown or was removed from this meeting is tampering with evidence. See link.

1:40:58. Utah Rule 408 has exception’s

Exceptions.
(b)(1) The court may admit this evidence for another purpose, such as proving a witness’s bias or prejudice, negating a contention of undue delay, or proving an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution.

(b)(2) The court is not required to exclude evidence otherwise discoverable merely because it is presented in the course of compromise negotiations.

1:41:07 Contractors work order bid was not shown or discussed concealment of evidence. $56,000 to bring basement up to average condition.

1:41:43 Not shown nor discussed was their comp, the other one was a identical home exact same floor plan as subject built one year prior to subject by the same contractor same brick and windows. By law Comparable properties cannot deviate + or - 5%. It was assessed for about $130,000 less than subject. More concealing evidence that hurts their positions.

1:42:03 Mr. Bodily stated this was the best time for me to present my evidence, even though he knew I was sick and could not talk. He motion to close the case and granted By Commissioner Cragun. without hesitation, a violation of CANNON law 2 for a fair and impartial hearing.

The tax commission sided with the assessor on September 19, 2021.
Filed for reconsideration with all the evidence that was concealed or not discussed in context of including five emails, three very lengthy PDFs including a response to Bodily’s response. Decision came back as no new evidence was submitted and no mistakes of laws made. Cited was the laws that where breached. That decision in itself was very purjurious in every way shape and form.

All parties where put on notice May 9, 2022 for a trial de novo. With 60 days notice that date expired July 9, 2022 and no one responded as required by law.

If this is a typical property tax appeal, I can only imagine what others have experienced if they paid attention to the details.

See links 👇

   • Property tax appeals process gets more com...  

https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title76/Cha...