Understanding Shift/Reduce Conflicts in Bison

Описание: Discover how to interpret and debug `shift/reduce` conflicts in Bison, enhancing your ability to write effective parsers for your projects.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63060610/ asked by the user 'Adi Mehrotra' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12468090/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63061066/ provided by the user 'Chris Dodd' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/16406/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: how to interpret "shift/reduce" conflicts in bison

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Shift/Reduce Conflicts in Bison: A Guide for Beginners

If you're diving into the world of parser generators like Bison, you may encounter a confusing problem known as shift/reduce conflicts. Understanding these conflicts is crucial, especially when you're writing a parser like a calculator using Bison and Flex. In this guide, we'll explore what shift/reduce conflicts are, how to identify them, and steps to resolve these issues to make your parser work effectively.

What Is a Shift/Reduce Conflict?

A shift/reduce conflict in Bison occurs when the grammar you’ve defined is ambiguous, meaning that it cannot determine uniquely how to parse a given input string using a single token lookahead. This conflict emerges primarily in expressions involving different operations, leading to uncertainty about operator precedence.

Example of a Conflict

Consider the expression A + B * C. There are two possible ways to interpret it:

Option 1: (A + B) * C (where + is evaluated before *)

Option 2: A + (B * C) (where * is evaluated before + )

This ambiguity is the root cause of the shift/reduce conflict you might see in Bison's verbose output.

How to Identify Shift/Reduce Conflicts

In your verbose output, Bison provides detailed insight into state transitions and rules. Here's an excerpt from your output:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breakdown of the Output

Let's look at what this means:

State 20 indicates that the parser has partially recognized rules involving the expr nonterminal and is now at a point where it can either shift a new token (like + , -, etc.) or reduce the expression according to a specified rule.

The parser does not know which operation to prioritize when confronted with multiple operators due to the partial recognition of rules, hence the conflict.

How to Resolve Shift/Reduce Conflicts

Review and Adjust Operator Precedence: Ensure that your grammar correctly reflects the intended precedence of operators. For example, multiplication and division should bind more tightly than addition and subtraction. In Bison, this can be managed using %left and %right declarations:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Use Parentheses for Clarity: Encourage the use of parentheses in expressions to clarify which operations should be performed first. This can help maintain explicit grouping in your grammar.

Refactor Ambiguous Rules: If possible, break down ambiguous parts in your grammar into more specific rules that prevent conflicts. For instance, consider handling binary operations with different precedence levels separately.

Conclusion

Understanding shift/reduce conflicts in Bison is key to developing efficient parsers for any language or calculator application. By reviewing your grammar carefully, adjusting operator precedence, and potentially refactoring your rules, you can resolve these conflicts and achieve a clear, functioning parser. With practice, interpreting these verbose outputs will become second nature, allowing you to tackle complex parsing challenges with confidence.



Whether you're new to Bison or looking to strengthen your parsing skills, remember: clarity in your grammar leads to a smoother parsing experience. Happy coding!