Case Summary: Bourhill v Young [1943]- House of Lords' decision-tort law-negligence-duty of care.

Описание: This video is a case summary of Bourhill v Young [1943]. I explain the facts of the case, the arguments put forward by the plaintiff and the defendant and the decision reached in the House of Lords.

00:00 Introduction
00:16 The facts of Bourhill v Young [1943]
01:09 What was the plaintiff's argument in Bourhill v Young [1943]?
01:57 What was the House of Lords' decision in Bourhill v Young [1943]?

What to watch next:
How does a secondary victim of psychiatric injury get damages in tort law?
   • How does a secondary victim of psychiatric...  
Playlist on pure psychiatric harm in English tort law. (This playlist includes videos which explain cases on psychiatric harm in English tort law.)
   • Primary and Secondary Victims- Psychiatric...  

It also includes case summaries on the following cases:
Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992],
McLoughlin v O’Brian [1983],
Page v Smith [1996],
Dulieu v White & Sons [1901],
Victorian Railway Commissioners v Coultas (1888) and
White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1999].

Playlist on negligence cases:
   • Facts of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)  

Read my blogs on pure psychiatric harm in English tort law https://www.lawwithdenise.com/blog?ca...

Keywords:
negligence tort law,duty of care negligence,bourhill v young 1943,bourhill vs young case,tort law,english law,psychiatric injury,psychiatric harm,primary and secondary victim,foundation law,nervous shock,a level law, bourhill vs young case,bourhill v young 1943,negligence,negligence tort law,psychiatric harm,pure psychiatric harm,english tort law,case summary,law with denise,duty of care negligence,duty of care tort law,foundation law,llb,nervous shock,primary and secondary victims,psychiatric injury,psychiatric injury tort law uk,tort law