ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

Stop Letting AI Pick Your Scraping/ Apify Actor — Do This Instead (80% Accuracy Fix) | Part 1

apify actor

apify tutorial

how to use apify

apify web scraper

apify make

make.com apify

make.com tutorial

make.com

n8n web scraping

apify n8n

web scraping automation

web scraping

ai automation

chatgpt web scraping

lead generation

automation

human in the loop

data scraping tutorial

no code automation

make automation

n8n tutorial

ai tools

anautomate

Автор: Antara Nag

Загружено: 2026-03-11

Просмотров: 6

Описание: I ran an AI-assisted scraping job to find websites for 241 companies.

The AI picked the Apify actor.
I paid $1.35.

The result?

Only 16% accuracy.

In this video I break down exactly what went wrong — and the 5-step Human-in-the-Loop framework I now use to prevent silent failures when using AI with scraping workflows.

You’ll see why AI-selected actors can fail silently, what hidden dependencies inside actor descriptions actually mean, and how switching to manual actor evaluation improved my results from 16% to 80% accuracy.

This video is Part 1 of a 2-part series.

Part 1 → The problem, the analysis, and the framework.
Part 2 → Full live demo of building the workflow in Apify + Make.com.

If you use AI for automation, lead generation, or scraping workflows, this lesson will save you time, money, and frustration.

🔗 Resources Mentioned

Apify Store
https://apify.com/store

Make.com
https://make.com

▶ Part 2 — Live Demo
In Part 1, I explain why AI-selected Apify actors failed and how I built a 5-step evaluation framework to fix the problem.

▶ Watch Part 2 first if you missed it:
   • How to Pick the Right Scraping/  Apify Act...  

Jump points in this demo:

00:00 — Apify: finding & selecting the right actor
05:34 — Make.com: building the full automation scenario

Quick question for builders here:

Are you running this kind of workflow in Make.com, n8n, or directly in IDE scripts?

Curious what the community prefers 👇

⏱ Chapters

00:00 I paid $1.35 for 241 websites. 16% accurate
01:14 The Goal — bulk company website scraping
02:04 Two Options — IDE vs Make.com
03:23 What Went Wrong — AI chose the actor
04:42 The Hidden Variable — not all actors do the same job
06:16 Apify Store — 1,274 actors for one search
06:50 The Turn — 16% vs 80% when I chose the actor
07:40 Actor Detail — reading the page that matters
08:15 The HITL Framework — 5-step actor evaluation
11:37 API Key Setup — one time, both platforms
13:14 Honest Trade-off — IDE vs Make.com, no winner
15:21 DEMO Screenshot — Make.com scenario
16:02 Key Takeaway + Subscribe CTA

🌐 Connect With Me

Website: https://anautomate.com/
LinkedIn (Personal):   / antaranag  
LinkedIn (Company):   / anautomate  
Email: [email protected]

Anautomate helps small teams Build • Scale • Optimise workflows using AI and automation.

👍 If this saved you time (or money), hit Like — it helps more founders and operators discover practical automation strategies.

🔔 Subscribe for real AI + automation workflows built from actual projects.

#Apify
#MakeCom
#WebScraping
#AIAutomation
#HumanInTheLoop

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Stop Letting AI Pick Your Scraping/ Apify Actor — Do This Instead (80% Accuracy Fix) | Part 1

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]