ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Автор: Quimbee

Загружено: 2021-09-29

Просмотров: 522

Описание: Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck | 139 S. Ct. 1921 (2019)

Under the state-action doctrine, the Constitution’s protections generally apply to governmental actors, not private actors. In Manhattan Community Access versus Halleck, Halleck claims her free speech rights have been curtailed by a corporation that operates public-access television channels. But can Halleck convince the court that the private entity silencing her speech is a governmental actor?

New York state law required that cable operators set aside channels for public access. The cable operator was charged with operating the channels unless local government designated another entity. Time Warner was the cable operator in Manhattan. New York City designated Manhattan Community Access, commonly known as the Manhattan Neighborhood Network or M N N, to operate Time Warner’s public-access channels in the area.

DeeDee Halleck and Jesus Papoleto Melendez produced a program criticizing M N N for its neglect of the East Harlem community. The program aired, but M N N later banned the producers from M N N services and facilities.

Halleck and Melendez sued M N N. The producers claimed that M N N violated their free-speech rights when it suspended their access to the channels based on the content of their program. M N N moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that it wasn’t a governmental actor subject to the First Amendment. The district court agreed and dismissed the complaint. The Second Circuit reversed. The Supreme Court granted cert.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/manhatt...

The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/manhatt...

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...
Facebook ►   / quimbeedotcom  
Twitter ►   / quimbeedotcom  
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

Зеленский обвиняет Европу, Убийство сотрудника РКН, Кремль урезал перемирие. Ганапольский, Смирнов

Зеленский обвиняет Европу, Убийство сотрудника РКН, Кремль урезал перемирие. Ганапольский, Смирнов

Bostock v.  Clayton County Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Bostock v. Clayton County Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Constitutional Law: Individual Rights — State Action Requirement

Constitutional Law: Individual Rights — State Action Requirement

Positive Winter Jazz Cafe ~ Delicate Morning Jazz Music & Bossa Nova Instrumental for Work, Study

Positive Winter Jazz Cafe ~ Delicate Morning Jazz Music & Bossa Nova Instrumental for Work, Study

United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Trump v. Hawaii [SCOTUSbrief]

Trump v. Hawaii [SCOTUSbrief]

Abrams v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Abrams v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Ramos v. Louisiana [SCOTUSbrief]

Ramos v. Louisiana [SCOTUSbrief]

ХИТЫ 2025🔝Лучшая музыка 2025 🏖️ Зарубежные песни Хиты 🏖️ Популярные песни Слушать бесплатно 2025

ХИТЫ 2025🔝Лучшая музыка 2025 🏖️ Зарубежные песни Хиты 🏖️ Популярные песни Слушать бесплатно 2025

Planned Parenthood v. Casey Summary | quimbee.com

Planned Parenthood v. Casey Summary | quimbee.com

Trump v. Hawaii Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Trump v. Hawaii Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Vintage Retro Jazz – Classic 1940’s Jazz Playlist

Vintage Retro Jazz – Classic 1940’s Jazz Playlist

Packingham v. North Carolina Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Packingham v. North Carolina Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Johnson v  M'Intosh

Johnson v M'Intosh

Успокаивающая музыка для нервов 🌿 лечебная музыка для сердца и сосудов, релакс, музыка для души #289

Успокаивающая музыка для нервов 🌿 лечебная музыка для сердца и сосудов, релакс, музыка для души #289

South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Batson v. Kentucky (1986) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary

Batson v. Kentucky (1986) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

If Defense LOSES Their Motion for Summary Judgment What is Chance They Appeal the Decision?

If Defense LOSES Their Motion for Summary Judgment What is Chance They Appeal the Decision?

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]