CJI’s “Cockroach” Remark Explained |
Автор: Law School Basics
Загружено: 2026-05-16
Просмотров: 3184
Описание:
Kya judiciary ko criticise karna contempt hota hai?
Kya unemployed youth, RTI activists aur media ko “cockroach” kehna constitutional morality ke against hai?
Is video me hum discuss karenge Chief Justice Surya Kant ki controversial remarks, Senior Advocate designation ka legal framework, fake law degrees ka issue, Bar Council of India ki responsibility, aur judiciary criticism se judi constitutional position.
Video me discussed: • Article 19(1)(a) and Free Speech
• Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
• Senior Advocate designation under Advocates Act, 1961
• Fake law degree controversy
• Role of RTI activists and media in democracy
• Human dignity under Article 21
• Important Supreme Court judgments:
Brahma Prakash Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh
P.N. Duda v. V.P. Shiv Shankar
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi
Ye video kisi institution ko demean karne ke liye nahi, balki constitutional dialogue aur legal awareness ke purpose se banayi gayi hai.
Hashtags:
#CJI #SupremeCourt #Judiciary #LegalAnalysis #Article19 #Article21 #RTI #FreeSpeech #ContemptOfCourt #LawStudents #IndianJudiciary #ConstitutionOfIndia #LegalEducation #AdvocatesAct #LawTube #ALawSchoolBasics #SuryaKant #LegalNews #IndianLaw
Повторяем попытку...
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео
-
Информация по загрузке: