JEPI Crushed MINT on Returns | But the Drawdown Was Devastating | Don't Make This Mistake

Описание: JEPI delivered 61% total returns over five years while MINT managed only 17%, but JEPI's 14% maximum drawdown was six times worse than MINT's 2.4% decline, exposing the hidden cost of chasing yield. This head-to-head ETF comparison reveals why income investors must choose between growth and stability carefully. 0:00 - JEPI Crushed MINT on Returns | But the Drawdown Was Devastating | Don't Make This Mistake 0:14 - The Five-Year Gap Is Even Worse 0:26 - Three-Year Returns Tell Same Story 0:38 - One-Year Performance Favors JEPI Again 0:48 - In Plain English: Total Returns 1:02 - Sharpe Ratio Reveals Efficiency Problem 1:14 - Three-Year Sharpe Shows MINT Recovery 1:27 - Sortino Ratio Measures Downside Risk 1:39 - In Plain English: Risk-Adjusted Returns 1:51 - Maximum Drawdown Shows Pain Tolerance 2:02 - Recovery Speed Nearly Identical 2:13 - In Plain English: Capital Preservation 2:27 - JEPI Pays Nearly Double the Yield 2:39 - What We've Learned So Far 2:54 - In Plain English: Income Generation 3:07 - Volatility Gap Measures Daily Chaos 3:18 - Volatility Drives Behavioral Mistakes 3:28 - In Plain English: Volatility and Stability 3:41 - MINT Spreads Across 899 Holdings 3:54 - Concentration Creates Opportunity and Risk 4:08 - In Plain English: Concentration Risk 4:23 - Beta Shows Market Connection 4:32 - Market Correlation Defines Strategy 4:45 - In Plain English: Market Correlation 4:57 - The Verdict Depends on Your Goals 5:08 - Which Fund Matches Your Profile? 5:20 - In Plain English: Choosing Your Fund 5:33 - Disclaimer 5:41 - Subscribe for More Fund Battles. Disclaimer: This content is for educational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax, or legal advice.

Note: The visual presentation and narration of this analysis were enhanced using generative AI to focus on delivering high-quality, actionable financial research.