"AI Assisted" Art: Just let me HAVE this, okay!?

Описание: In this episode, Xeroforhire delivers a raw, unscripted response to a recent literary video arguing that AI will make writers lazy, stupid, and illiterate. After initially internalizing the critique—and feeling genuine doubt about his own AI-assisted workflow—he pushes back hard against what he sees as a deeper problem: artistic gatekeeping disguised as moral superiority.


He challenges the romanticized idea that “real” art must come from suffering, bleeding, and prolonged misery, arguing that this mindset has turned publishing into a ritualized hierarchy where creators police how others are allowed to create. Drawing parallels to the music industry, comics, and visual art, he reframes AI as just another tool—no different in principle from editors, 3D models, samples, references, or collaboration.


At the heart of the episode is a defense of finishing work, shipping projects, and gaining small wins as legitimate paths to growth. He argues that endless suffering without completion leads to bitterness, burnout, and self-loathing within artist communities, while AI-assisted creation allows people to learn iteratively, build confidence, and actually produce things.


The episode ultimately rejects moralized creativity altogether. Xeroforhire insists that meaning comes not from appeasing gatekeepers or proving one’s pain, but from choosing how to spend one’s limited time, energy, and resources—and finding joy in the act of making something real.


Timestamps


00:00:02 — Intro: unscripted reaction episode, “not as planned out”


00:00:23 — Introduces The Second Story / Hilary Jane and why her videos mattered to him


00:01:00 — Her broader critique: modern writing + ideology / critical theory framing


00:02:03 — This month’s trigger: her AI video (“AI will make you stupid/illiterate”) and his initial spiral


00:02:44 — Bowling bumpers analogy + the “books with bumpers” gut-punch reaction


00:03:45 — Publishing as gatekeeping; “writing is supposed to be hard” and the suffering ethic


00:05:00 — His main divergence: rejecting the idea that art must come from bleeding/suffering


00:06:41 — Trauma-book culture + “people only compare your suffering to their suffering”


00:07:10 — Two truths: writing is hard and creators need small wins / validation / shipping


00:08:21 — AI vs editor vs collaborators: “four variations of the same thing” + he prioritizes shipping


00:09:12 — “Let me have this”: moral frustration, faithfulness, and refusing creative policing


00:11:14 — Shortcuts in art (3D models, tracing) + skill atrophy concern acknowledged


00:12:16 — Why he hates the “artist community” self-deprecation loop; finishing ＞ perfection paralysis


00:13:02 — His growth process: AI helps him outline / learn / finish / iterate


00:14:00 — Generative art as curation; rejects moral panic comparisons (slot machine vs gambling)


00:15:01 — Comic art rates + music industry “plants” comparison (Youngblud)


00:16:22 — Who gets to judge: him + the market, not gatekeepers; readers enjoying AI-assisted work


00:17:08 — “Will writing suffer?” He argues it expands; “people still like McDonald’s / auto-tune”


00:18:29 — What people really ask about art: the human story behind it, not “literary standards”


00:19:07 — Individualism / “it’s my life” rant; comparing “you can’t exist that way” rhetoric


00:20:05 — Close: final “buzz off” and end of episode


This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit xeroforhire.substack.com/subscribe (https://xeroforhire.substack.com/subs...)