UDRP Case Study: When to Avoid Large Complaints

Описание: Consolidating multiple domain names into a single complaint under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) can be an incredibly efficient way for a trademark owner to tackle cybersquatters -- but this video discusses a case that makes clear why this practice is not always the right choice and needs to be taken seriously. Here, Doug Isenberg discusses why a UDRP panel at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) rejected a trademark owner's attempt to include 14 domain names in one complaint, forcing the trademark owner to expend additional time and money filing multiple complaints.

Resources:

Fenix International Limited v. Private Registry Authority et al., WIPO Case No. D2022-3002: https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/s...

​​- GigaLaw website: https://giga.law/

GigaLaw's Domain Dispute Digest: https://giga.law/digest

​- Domain Name Disputes: A Masterclass: https://giga.law/masterclass

About Doug Isenberg: https://giga.law/about-doug-isenberg

Disclaimer: This video is for general informational purposes only, provides only a summary of specific issues, and is not intended to be and should not be relied upon as legal advice regarding any specific situation. This video is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Viewers should consult with legal counsel to determine how laws, policies or decisions and other topics discussed in this video apply to the viewers' specific circumstances. This video may be considered attorney advertising under court rules of certain jurisdictions. Copyright © 2023 Douglas M. Isenberg