ycliper

Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
Скачать

Korematsu v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Автор: Quimbee

Загружено: 2023-10-13

Просмотров: 9999

Описание: Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 35,900 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 984 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Korematsu v. United States | 584 F. Supp. 1406 (1984)

Fred Korematsu was best known as the Japanese American who unsuccessfully challenged the constitutionality of the internment of Japanese Americans during World War Two. Forty years after the United States Supreme Court decided his case, another court revisited the U S government’s treatment of Korematsu in Korematsu versus United States.

In nineteen forty-one, the U S declared war on Japan. The president issued Executive Order Ninety Sixty-Six, which gave the Secretary of War the power to designate military zones and keep people out of those areas. Congress made it a crime to ignore an order to leave a military zone. A portion of the west coast was designated Military Area Number One . Then, an order excluded those of Japanese ancestry from living there unless they were in assembly centers.

Fred Korematsu’s ancestors were Japanese. He lived in zone one but didn’t report to an assembly center. Korematsu was convicted of breaking federal law, which was upheld on appeal .

Decades after the internment of Japanese Americans ended, Congress created the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians. The commission’s report stated that there wasn’t a military necessity for the internment. According to the report, the internment was an unjust product of racial prejudice, war hysteria, and leadership failures.

Korematsu filed a petition for a writ of coram nobis to vacate his conviction, arguing that the conviction resulted from the government’s misconduct. In support, Korematsu cited the report and government memorandums showing the government withheld evidence that internment wasn’t necessary from the courts. The U S responded. Though the government didn’t admit to wrongdoing or specifically oppose the petition, it moved the court to vacate Korematsu’s conviction and dismiss the indictment. The judge decided Korematsu’s petition and the government’s motion to vacate.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/koremat...

The Quimbee App features over 35,900 case briefs keyed to 984 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/koremat...

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_...

Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...
Facebook ►   / quimbeedotcom  
Twitter ►   / quimbeedotcom  
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Korematsu v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио

Похожие видео

When the Supreme Court Justified Japanese Internment Camps | Korematsu v. United States

When the Supreme Court Justified Japanese Internment Camps | Korematsu v. United States

District of Columbia v. Heller Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

District of Columbia v. Heller Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Marbury v. Madison Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Marbury v. Madison Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

4 Hours Chopin for Studying, Concentration & Relaxation

4 Hours Chopin for Studying, Concentration & Relaxation

Ugly History: Japanese American incarceration camps - Densho

Ugly History: Japanese American incarceration camps - Densho

What happened in Korematsu v. United States?

What happened in Korematsu v. United States?

Проделки Верховного суда!

Проделки Верховного суда!

Miranda v. Arizona Explained

Miranda v. Arizona Explained

Korematsu v United States - the U.S. Supreme Court Case legalizing Japanese Internment

Korematsu v United States - the U.S. Supreme Court Case legalizing Japanese Internment

Korematsu vs United States Explained : US History Review

Korematsu vs United States Explained : US History Review

Trump v. Hawaii & The Shadow of Korematsu

Trump v. Hawaii & The Shadow of Korematsu

Дред Скотт против Сэндфорда | Помощь с домашним заданием от Института Билля о правах

Дред Скотт против Сэндфорда | Помощь с домашним заданием от Института Билля о правах

Anna Kalinskaya v Iga Swiatek Highlights | Australian Open 2026 Third Round

Anna Kalinskaya v Iga Swiatek Highlights | Australian Open 2026 Third Round

Brown v. Board of Education, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Review, Required Supreme Court Cases]

Brown v. Board of Education, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Review, Required Supreme Court Cases]

Can the Police Use Evidence They Got Illegally? | Mapp v. Ohio

Can the Police Use Evidence They Got Illegally? | Mapp v. Ohio

Loving v. Virginia Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Loving v. Virginia Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

KOREMATSU VERSUS US

KOREMATSU VERSUS US

Top 10 Supreme Court Justices in American History

Top 10 Supreme Court Justices in American History

What Were the Slaughter-House Cases?

What Were the Slaughter-House Cases?

© 2025 ycliper. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]