Codex 5.3 vs Opus 4.6: The Benchmark Nobody Expected. (How to STOP Picking the Wrong Agent)

Описание: My site: https://natebjones.com
Full Story w/ Prompts: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/...
_______________________________________
What's really happening when two competing visions of AI agents ship 20 minutes apart? The common story is that this is a benchmark race—but the reality is more complicated when the choice between Codex and Claude determines how your entire week changes.

In this video, I share the inside scoop on why OpenAI and Anthropic built fundamentally different answers to the same question:

• Why Codex bets on autonomous correctness while Claude bets on integration and coordination
• How the three-layer orchestrator architecture enables hand-it-off-and-walk-away work
• What Agent Teams with peer-to-peer messaging means for interdependent problems
• Where the meta-skill of evaluating new capabilities becomes the durable advantage

For knowledge workers choosing between delegation-shaped problems and coordination-shaped problems, the right question is not which tool wins—it's which organizational muscle you want to build.

Chapters
00:00 Two Visions Ship 20 Minutes Apart
02:30 Codex as Employee vs Claude as Team
06:05 Codex Benchmarks: 12 Points Ahead on Terminal Bench
07:48 The First Model That Helped Build Itself
09:31 The Codex Desktop App: A Command Center
11:57 The Three-Layer Trust Architecture
15:17 Non-Coding Uses: Meeting Transcripts to Regulatory Filings
17:56 Opus 4.6: Integration Over Isolation
20:16 Agent Teams With Peer-to-Peer Coordination
22:36 Three Questions for Choosing Between Them
25:35 Which Approach Ages Better
28:01 The Meta-Skill That Becomes Durable

Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news.
For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/