🚨 Anant Kumar Yadav & Shikha Ranjan-IAS/PCS

Описание: क्या प्रशासनिक पद पर बैठे लोग समाज में नफरत फैला सकते हैं? पटना के दो अधिकारी—अनंत कुमार यादव (SDO) और शिखा रंजन (BPRO)—ने विवाह के नाम पर जो 'वैचारिक सर्कस' किया है, उसने गंभीर संवैधानिक और नैतिक प्रश्न खड़े कर दिए हैं।

मुख्य बिंदु (Key Highlights):
• आरक्षणजीवी मानसिकता: हिन्दू OBC कोटे से नौकरी ली, पर संस्कार निभाने में शर्म आई?
• कानूनी उल्लंघन: हिन्दू विवाह अधिनियम की धारा 7 और सिविल सेवा आचार संहिता 1964 का खुला मजाक।
• दोगलापन: शादी के कार्ड पर गणेश जी और वैदिक मंत्र, पर कैमरे के सामने 'क्रांतिकारी' बनने का ढोंग?
• प्रशासनिक तटस्थता: जो अधिकारी एक समुदाय (ब्राह्मणों) के प्रति सार्वजनिक नफरत फैला रहे हैं, वे जनता के साथ न्याय कैसे करेंगे?
• हमारी मांग: भारत सरकार और राष्ट्रपति से अपील—इन पर तुरंत अनुशासनात्मक कार्यवाही हो। 'नो फेथ, नो बेनिफिट' कानून बने!

OWNERSHIP NOTICE: This video is the original property of (Behen-ji- YouTube Channel ]. My official logo is visible throughout the video as proof of authenticity. I am the creator appearing in this footage, and I hold the exclusive rights to the audio, script, and visual presentation. Any third-party clips used are under 'Fair Use' for commentary purposes. Unauthorised re-uploads or false claims will be strictly contested.

Copyright Disclaimer:
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
• Ownership: I am the creator of this video. I appear in the visual footage, and the audio/voiceover is my original work.
• Script: The script used in this video is my original intellectual property.
• Third-Party Material: Any third-party clips or images (including public speeches) used in this video are for transformative purposes, such as providing commentary, analysis, or news reporting.
• No Copyright Infringement Intended: This video does not serve as a substitute for the original source material. All rights belong to their respective owners where applicable.

Disclaimer: This video is created for educational, historical, and critical analysis purposes only. The content discusses social and political issues, ideological hypocrisy. It does not intend to promote hatred, violence, or discrimination against any individual, religion, or community. We respect the constitutional right to freedom of speech and believe in healthy public discourse. All references are based on public records and personal commentary.

#ProjectAshwamit #Expose #UPPolitics #ChandrashekharAzad #DhruvRathee #DeshBhakti #CastePolitics #viralvideo
#SocialJustice #AdministrativeEthics #HinduMarriageAct #ReservationPolicy #BiharNews #PatnaOfficers #SanatanDharma #ConductRules #NoFaithNoBenefit

Anant Kumar Yadav SDM, Shikha Ranjan BPRO, Hindu Marriage Act Section 7, Civil Service Conduct Rules 1964 violation, Yadav couple wedding controversy, Reservation vs Religion, No Faith No Benefit law, Administrative Neutrality, Brahmin vs Ideology, Bihar bureaucratic controversy, Anti-Hindu narrative in bureaucracy, Constitutional morality vs Personal ideology.