Selzer v. Brunsell Bros. (2002) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary

Описание: Peter Selzer sued Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company because the windows he bought from them decayed. Selzer claimed that Marvin breached a warranty, but the court found that Selzer's warranty claims were time-barred and that the economic loss doctrine barred his misrepresentation claims. Selzer made a prima facie showing that an express warranty existed, but the court found that it did not explicitly extend to future performance. Selzer's implied warranty claim was also time-barred. The court dismissed Selzer's false advertising claim as time-barred. Selzer's misrepresentation claims were barred by the economic loss doctrine because the windows were an integral part of an integrated system, and therefore, not subject to misrepresentation claims.

Selzer v. Brunsell Bros. (2002)
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
257 Wis. 2d 809, 2002 WI App 232, 652 N.W.2d 806

Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/selze...

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_c...