How to Compare Mono Error to a String in Java: A Guide for Java Developers

Описание: Learn how to effectively compare errors from Mono in Java to a String. This guide walks you through solutions to common exception handling issues.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/67383511/ asked by the user 'CrazyCoder' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8930751/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67388099/ provided by the user 'JayC667' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1932011/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to compare Mono error to a String in Java

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Compare Mono Error to a String in Java: A Guide for Java Developers

When working with Java's reactive programming, especially using Project Reactor's Mono, you may encounter some challenges when testing for exceptions. One common scenario developers face is comparing the error messages thrown by a Mono operation to an expected String. This post aims to walk you through a scenario where this issue arises and provides several solutions to effectively handle it.

The Problem

In the given scenario, we have a method DoAction that returns a Mono<SomeDTO>. Within this method, we handle a user lookup, and if the user does not exist, an error is thrown. The goal is to catch this exception in a unit test and compare its message to an expected String. However, due to the way exceptions are propagated, you may end up with an error message that includes additional information, like the exception's class name, making direct comparisons problematic.

Here's a brief look at the method and the corresponding test case:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In the test case, you might have something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The test fails because the result contains extra string information. Let's look at some solutions to tackle this issue.

Solutions

1. Create a Specific Exception Class

Instead of using a generic Exception, consider creating a specific exception class for this situation. For example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In your DoAction method, throw this specific exception:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In your test case, you can then check the exception type explicitly without worrying about the message format:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Extend Your Expected String

As a quick workaround, you could modify the expected string in your test to include the additional type information. This isn't optimal but could be a fast fix:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

3. Access the Root Cause of the Exception

If the exception returned is wrapped, you could retrieve the root cause. Update your test case to get the cause of the exception:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Adding .printStackTrace() can help debug what the actual structure of the thrown exception is, making error resolution straightforward.

Conclusion

Handling exceptions in a reactive programming context can be complicated, especially when testing. By following the solutions outlined above, you should be able to effectively compare errors thrown by Mono to expected strings. Whether through custom exceptions, modifying your expectations, or accessing the root cause, you can ensure your tests are robust and reliable.

If you continue facing challenges or have more questions, feel free to reach out for further assistance!