How to Mock Optional.map().orElseThrow() with Mockito in Spring Testing

Описание: Learn how to effectively mock `Optional.map().orElseThrow()` in your tests using Mockito. Simplify your setup and understand common pitfalls with this comprehensive guide.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75334134/ asked by the user 'Pioter88' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/17009760/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75334781/ provided by the user 'Lesiak' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1570854/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Mockito how to mock Optional.map().orElseThrow()

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Mock Optional.map().orElseThrow() with Mockito in Spring Testing

When it comes to testing Java applications, especially ones built on the Spring framework, you may encounter challenges with mocking. One such challenge arises when dealing with the Optional class and its methods, like map() and orElseThrow(). In this guide, we will dive into a common problem associated with mocking these methods using Mockito and provide a detailed solution to simplify the testing process.

The Problem

Imagine you are working with a ProjectService that contains a method to create a group based on a given Project ID. The method uses Optional.map() to perform some logic on the retrieved project. However, you face an issue during your test where it throws a NoSuchElementException indicating that the project ID was not found—even when you believe you’ve mocked the repository correctly. Specifically, this exception occurs when your mocked Optional unexpectedly returns null.

Sample Method Code

Here’s the critical part of the createGroup method we’re focusing on:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, in your test, you've set it up like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

But instead of executing the logic in map(), it falls into orElseThrow(), leading to that pesky exception.

The Solution

Let’s break down how you can resolve this issue effectively.

1. Review the Logic Inside map()

The method you passed to map() is returning null. Since taskGroupRepository.save(taskGroup) is not stubbed in your test setup, it defaults to returning null from the mock. Thus, it triggers the orElseThrow() method as it requires a non-null result.

Fix: Make sure to stub the save() method in the taskGroupRepository mock, as shown below:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Avoid Unnecessary Mocking

You don't need to mock everything that is involved in the test. If certain objects are simple POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects), you can instantiate them directly with their desired state rather than mocking their behavior, which simplifies the test setup.

3. Simplify the Test Setup

Using @ SpringBootTest may be overkill for your testing needs. Instead, rely on @ MockitoExtension, along with @ Mock and @ InjectMocks for a more streamlined configuration. This keeps your test focused and performance-efficient.

Final Sample Test Code

After applying the above recommendations, your test code will look as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

Mocking methods like Optional.map() alongside orElseThrow() can seem tricky, especially when returning null unexpectedly. By carefully reviewing the logic in your map() function, avoiding excessive mocking of simple POJOs, and optimizing your test setup, you can streamline your testing workflow with Mockito significantly. Don't let mocking become a source of frustration—understanding these pitfalls and solutions can make your testing experience much smoother.

Implement these strategies to ensure that your unit tests are both robust and easy to maintain. Happy testing!